The effect of religiosity on climate change policies

This paper investigates how religiosity affects the formulation of climate change policies. Much research has been done on the relationship between religiosity and environmental preferences, but few have looked at how this cultural factor influences environmental policies, specifically climate chang...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lim, Sue Qin, Ng, Jia Hui, Tew, Ying Sian
Other Authors: James Ang
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/77092
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-77092
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-770922019-12-10T12:27:57Z The effect of religiosity on climate change policies Lim, Sue Qin Ng, Jia Hui Tew, Ying Sian James Ang School of Social Sciences DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic development This paper investigates how religiosity affects the formulation of climate change policies. Much research has been done on the relationship between religiosity and environmental preferences, but few have looked at how this cultural factor influences environmental policies, specifically climate change policies. Using data from the World Values Survey (WVS) from 1981-2014, we examine how religiosity is related to the Climate Laws, Institutions and Measures Index (CLIMI) from 2005-2011. We find that religious countries tend to have less extensive and stringent climate change policies, where a 0.1 increase in religiosity is associated with a 5.30 points decrease in CLIMI score. Our results are robust to a number of considerations. In addition, we also investigate how this relationship varies according to some important socioeconomic circumstances. The results indicate the negative effect of religiosity is more pronounced in countries that are more democratic, more developed and that have lower regulatory quality. Bachelor of Arts in Economics 2019-05-07T01:53:28Z 2019-05-07T01:53:28Z 2019 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/77092 en 37 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic development
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic development
Lim, Sue Qin
Ng, Jia Hui
Tew, Ying Sian
The effect of religiosity on climate change policies
description This paper investigates how religiosity affects the formulation of climate change policies. Much research has been done on the relationship between religiosity and environmental preferences, but few have looked at how this cultural factor influences environmental policies, specifically climate change policies. Using data from the World Values Survey (WVS) from 1981-2014, we examine how religiosity is related to the Climate Laws, Institutions and Measures Index (CLIMI) from 2005-2011. We find that religious countries tend to have less extensive and stringent climate change policies, where a 0.1 increase in religiosity is associated with a 5.30 points decrease in CLIMI score. Our results are robust to a number of considerations. In addition, we also investigate how this relationship varies according to some important socioeconomic circumstances. The results indicate the negative effect of religiosity is more pronounced in countries that are more democratic, more developed and that have lower regulatory quality.
author2 James Ang
author_facet James Ang
Lim, Sue Qin
Ng, Jia Hui
Tew, Ying Sian
format Final Year Project
author Lim, Sue Qin
Ng, Jia Hui
Tew, Ying Sian
author_sort Lim, Sue Qin
title The effect of religiosity on climate change policies
title_short The effect of religiosity on climate change policies
title_full The effect of religiosity on climate change policies
title_fullStr The effect of religiosity on climate change policies
title_full_unstemmed The effect of religiosity on climate change policies
title_sort effect of religiosity on climate change policies
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/77092
_version_ 1681047555265265664