Modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity

Low-impact development (LID), also known as a sustainable urban drainage systems, refers to a system that improve the stormwater runoff management by imitating the natural hydrologic processes. Many past studies have shown LID effectiveness in improving water quality, reducing stormwater runoff and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cheam, Yu Juen
Other Authors: Qin Xiaosheng
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/77384
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-77384
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-773842023-03-03T17:01:25Z Modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity Cheam, Yu Juen Qin Xiaosheng School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering Low-impact development (LID), also known as a sustainable urban drainage systems, refers to a system that improve the stormwater runoff management by imitating the natural hydrologic processes. Many past studies have shown LID effectiveness in improving water quality, reducing stormwater runoff and recreating green spaces in urban areas. However, it is still a challenging issue to determine how many LID controls should be implemented to maximize the performance of LID in the catchment, considering the cost factor. Hence, this paper examine the effectiveness of incorporate LID controls in urban planning by evaluating the hydrologic performances of LID and the cost of LID. Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) software is used in this study to simulate the effect of implementing a different percentage of LID controls (Green roofs, Bioretention cells, Permeable pavement) at the artificial catchment area. The cost of LID per unit sqm is calculated using a costing tool by Toronto and Region Conservation (2013). Three different MCDA methods (AHP, TOPSIS, WSM) are used to compare the 8 different alternatives to identify the best alternatives with respect to the weighting factor set. In this study, the hydrologic performance of LID is more important than the cost of LID (weighting factor of performance larger than cost) and therefore the alternatives with 80% of LID being implemented (Case 8) is chosen as the best alternative. Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) 2019-05-28T02:46:25Z 2019-05-28T02:46:25Z 2019 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/77384 en Nanyang Technological University 61 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering
Cheam, Yu Juen
Modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity
description Low-impact development (LID), also known as a sustainable urban drainage systems, refers to a system that improve the stormwater runoff management by imitating the natural hydrologic processes. Many past studies have shown LID effectiveness in improving water quality, reducing stormwater runoff and recreating green spaces in urban areas. However, it is still a challenging issue to determine how many LID controls should be implemented to maximize the performance of LID in the catchment, considering the cost factor. Hence, this paper examine the effectiveness of incorporate LID controls in urban planning by evaluating the hydrologic performances of LID and the cost of LID. Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) software is used in this study to simulate the effect of implementing a different percentage of LID controls (Green roofs, Bioretention cells, Permeable pavement) at the artificial catchment area. The cost of LID per unit sqm is calculated using a costing tool by Toronto and Region Conservation (2013). Three different MCDA methods (AHP, TOPSIS, WSM) are used to compare the 8 different alternatives to identify the best alternatives with respect to the weighting factor set. In this study, the hydrologic performance of LID is more important than the cost of LID (weighting factor of performance larger than cost) and therefore the alternatives with 80% of LID being implemented (Case 8) is chosen as the best alternative.
author2 Qin Xiaosheng
author_facet Qin Xiaosheng
Cheam, Yu Juen
format Final Year Project
author Cheam, Yu Juen
author_sort Cheam, Yu Juen
title Modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity
title_short Modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity
title_full Modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity
title_fullStr Modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity
title_full_unstemmed Modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity
title_sort modelling low-impact development on urban drainage systems under complexity
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/77384
_version_ 1759855656825782272