Case studies of construction dispute on SOP Act

• Main Author: Lin, Henry Heng
• Other Authors: Wong Wai Fan
• Format: Final Year Project
• Language: English
• Published: 2019
• Subjects: DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10356/78044
• Institution: Nanyang Technological University

Resolution of construction disputes used to be a lengthy and often costly process as many legal firms were unfamiliar with the issues pertaining to construction matters. As a result, the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment (SOP) bill was passed in the parliament on 16th November 2004 to address this specific problem. The SOP Act was later enacted on 1st April 2005, seeking to accelerate cash flow by launching a quick and relatively low cost adjudication procedure to mediate payment disputes. This project reviewed the practice of Security of Payment (SOP) Act as a legislation through the form of in-depth analysis of the Act itself and recent case studies related to said Act. The focus was with regards to Payment Response and Payment Claim. The cases of Audi Construction Pte Ltd vs Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd [2017] and Bintai Kidenko Pte Ltd vs Samsung C&T Corporation [2017] were selected as these are current cases that provide an expansive coverage on the aspects of Payment Claim and Payment Response issues.