Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives

Hong Kong ceased to be a colony of Britain on June 30th, 1997, thus entering a new stage of its development and evolution as a uniquely-constituted city state and urban metropolis. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China (HKSAR) inherited a linguistic ecology that owed much to its previ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bolton, Kingsley
Other Authors: Wei, Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2015
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/79264
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/38780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-79264
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-792642020-03-07T12:10:37Z Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives Bolton, Kingsley Wei, Li School of Humanities and Social Sciences Hong Kong ceased to be a colony of Britain on June 30th, 1997, thus entering a new stage of its development and evolution as a uniquely-constituted city state and urban metropolis. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China (HKSAR) inherited a linguistic ecology that owed much to its previous existence as a British colony, where the Chinese language had had no de jure status until 1974. From 1995, the stated policy of government has been to promote a “biliterate” (Chinese and English) and “trilingual” (Cantonese, Putonghua and English) society, and various measures have also been taken to promote the use of Chinese as a medium of instruction in schools. Immediately after the change in sovereignty, Putonghua became a compulsory school subject for the first time. This paper will examine the issue of language planning and policies partly froman historical perspective, but also through a consideration of current policies and practices across a range of domains, including government, law and education. One major conclusion that emerges from this discussion is that, from a language policy perspective, the relationship between Chinese and English in the Hong Kong context is potentially far less contentious than that between Cantonese and Putonghua. Accepted version 2015-10-01T09:26:30Z 2019-12-06T13:21:08Z 2015-10-01T09:26:30Z 2019-12-06T13:21:08Z 2011 2011 Journal Article Bolton, K. (2011). Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 51-74. 1868-6303 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/79264 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/38780 10.1515/9783110239331.51 en Applied Linguistics Review © 2011 De Gruyter. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Applied Linguistics Review, De Gruyter. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110239331.51]. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
description Hong Kong ceased to be a colony of Britain on June 30th, 1997, thus entering a new stage of its development and evolution as a uniquely-constituted city state and urban metropolis. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China (HKSAR) inherited a linguistic ecology that owed much to its previous existence as a British colony, where the Chinese language had had no de jure status until 1974. From 1995, the stated policy of government has been to promote a “biliterate” (Chinese and English) and “trilingual” (Cantonese, Putonghua and English) society, and various measures have also been taken to promote the use of Chinese as a medium of instruction in schools. Immediately after the change in sovereignty, Putonghua became a compulsory school subject for the first time. This paper will examine the issue of language planning and policies partly froman historical perspective, but also through a consideration of current policies and practices across a range of domains, including government, law and education. One major conclusion that emerges from this discussion is that, from a language policy perspective, the relationship between Chinese and English in the Hong Kong context is potentially far less contentious than that between Cantonese and Putonghua.
author2 Wei, Li
author_facet Wei, Li
Bolton, Kingsley
format Article
author Bolton, Kingsley
spellingShingle Bolton, Kingsley
Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives
author_sort Bolton, Kingsley
title Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives
title_short Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives
title_full Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives
title_fullStr Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Language policy and planning in Hong Kong: Colonial and post-colonial perspectives
title_sort language policy and planning in hong kong: colonial and post-colonial perspectives
publishDate 2015
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/79264
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/38780
_version_ 1681037291475173376