Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s
Whereas the rare existing comparative studies of Chinese and Indian diaspora policies have focused on recent periods following economic restructuring in both countries, this article, using a historical perspective, looks at diaspora policies in both countries from the angle of conceptions of the nat...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80797 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43435 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-80797 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-807972020-03-07T12:10:37Z Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s van Dongen, Els School of Humanities and Social Sciences Diaspora policies China Whereas the rare existing comparative studies of Chinese and Indian diaspora policies have focused on recent periods following economic restructuring in both countries, this article, using a historical perspective, looks at diaspora policies in both countries from the angle of conceptions of the nation. Comparing three specific periods – the early twentieth century, the period between the 1950s and the 1970s, and the period since the 1970s – the article argues that there was a similarity between China and India in terms of how conceptions of the nation expanded and contracted together with both domestic and international changes during these periods, in spite of differences in nationality laws. As such, it demonstrates that countries with nationality laws based on jus sanguinis are not necessarily always more inclusive towards diaspora populations than those with nationality laws based on jus soli. In both cases, there is a tension at work between a state-led paradigm that is territorial in nature and ethnic and cultural notions of nationhood. Accepted version 2017-07-25T07:02:49Z 2019-12-06T13:59:09Z 2017-07-25T07:02:49Z 2019-12-06T13:59:09Z 2016 Journal Article van Dongen, E. (2017). Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s. Asian Studies Review, 41(1), 117-135. 1035-7823 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80797 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43435 10.1080/10357823.2016.1264363 en Asian Studies Review © 2016 Asian Studies Association of Australia (published by Taylor & Francis). This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in Asian Studies Review, published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of Asian Studies Association of Australia. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1264363]. 21 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Diaspora policies China |
spellingShingle |
Diaspora policies China van Dongen, Els Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s |
description |
Whereas the rare existing comparative studies of Chinese and Indian diaspora policies have focused on recent periods following economic restructuring in both countries, this article, using a historical perspective, looks at diaspora policies in both countries from the angle of conceptions of the nation. Comparing three specific periods – the early twentieth century, the period between the 1950s and the 1970s, and the period since the 1970s – the article argues that there was a similarity between China and India in terms of how conceptions of the nation expanded and contracted together with both domestic and international changes during these periods, in spite of differences in nationality laws. As such, it demonstrates that countries with nationality laws based on jus sanguinis are not necessarily always more inclusive towards diaspora populations than those with nationality laws based on jus soli. In both cases, there is a tension at work between a state-led paradigm that is territorial in nature and ethnic and cultural notions of nationhood. |
author2 |
School of Humanities and Social Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Humanities and Social Sciences van Dongen, Els |
format |
Article |
author |
van Dongen, Els |
author_sort |
van Dongen, Els |
title |
Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s |
title_short |
Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s |
title_full |
Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s |
title_fullStr |
Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s |
title_full_unstemmed |
Behind the Ties that Bind: Diaspora-making and Nation-building in China and India in Historical Perspective, 1850s-2010s |
title_sort |
behind the ties that bind: diaspora-making and nation-building in china and india in historical perspective, 1850s-2010s |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80797 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43435 |
_version_ |
1681036277710848000 |