The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology

Assessment of seismic hazard relies on estimates of how large an area of a tectonic fault could potentially rupture in a single earthquake. Vital information for these forecasts includes which areas of a fault are locked and how the fault is segmented. Much research has focused on exploring downdip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiu, Qiang, Hill, Emma Mary, Barbot, Sylvain, Hubbard, Judith, Feng, Wanpeng, Lindsey, Eric Ostrom, Feng, Lujia, Dai, Keren, Samsonov, Sergey V., Tapponnier, Paul
Other Authors: Earth Observatory of Singapore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80828
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42246
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-80828
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-808282020-09-26T21:27:49Z The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology Qiu, Qiang Hill, Emma Mary Barbot, Sylvain Hubbard, Judith Feng, Wanpeng Lindsey, Eric Ostrom Feng, Lujia Dai, Keren Samsonov, Sergey V. Tapponnier, Paul Earth Observatory of Singapore Earthquakes Geophysics Assessment of seismic hazard relies on estimates of how large an area of a tectonic fault could potentially rupture in a single earthquake. Vital information for these forecasts includes which areas of a fault are locked and how the fault is segmented. Much research has focused on exploring downdip limits to fault rupture from chemical and thermal boundaries, and along-strike barriers from subducted structural features, yet we regularly see only partial rupture of fully locked fault patches that could have ruptured as a whole in a larger earthquake. Here we draw insight into this conundrum from the 25 April 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake. We invert geodetic data with a structural model of the Main Himalayan thrust in the region of Kathmandu, Nepal, showing that this event was generated by rupture of a décollement bounded on all sides by more steeply dipping ramps. The morphological bounds explain why the event ruptured only a small piece of a large fully locked seismic gap. We then use dynamic earthquake cycle modeling on the same fault geometry to reveal that such events are predicted by the physics. Depending on the earthquake history and the details of rupture dynamics, however, great earthquakes that rupture the entire seismogenic zone are also possible. These insights from Nepal should be applicable to understanding bounds on earthquake size on megathrusts worldwide. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Published version 2017-04-07T08:15:43Z 2019-12-06T13:59:50Z 2017-04-07T08:15:43Z 2019-12-06T13:59:50Z 2016 Journal Article Qiu, Q., Hill, E. M., Barbot, S., Hubbard, J., Feng, W., Lindsey, E. O., et al. (2016). The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology. Geology, 44(10), 875-878. 0091-7613 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80828 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42246 10.1130/G38178.1 en Geology © 2016 The Authors. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. 4 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Earthquakes
Geophysics
spellingShingle Earthquakes
Geophysics
Qiu, Qiang
Hill, Emma Mary
Barbot, Sylvain
Hubbard, Judith
Feng, Wanpeng
Lindsey, Eric Ostrom
Feng, Lujia
Dai, Keren
Samsonov, Sergey V.
Tapponnier, Paul
The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology
description Assessment of seismic hazard relies on estimates of how large an area of a tectonic fault could potentially rupture in a single earthquake. Vital information for these forecasts includes which areas of a fault are locked and how the fault is segmented. Much research has focused on exploring downdip limits to fault rupture from chemical and thermal boundaries, and along-strike barriers from subducted structural features, yet we regularly see only partial rupture of fully locked fault patches that could have ruptured as a whole in a larger earthquake. Here we draw insight into this conundrum from the 25 April 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake. We invert geodetic data with a structural model of the Main Himalayan thrust in the region of Kathmandu, Nepal, showing that this event was generated by rupture of a décollement bounded on all sides by more steeply dipping ramps. The morphological bounds explain why the event ruptured only a small piece of a large fully locked seismic gap. We then use dynamic earthquake cycle modeling on the same fault geometry to reveal that such events are predicted by the physics. Depending on the earthquake history and the details of rupture dynamics, however, great earthquakes that rupture the entire seismogenic zone are also possible. These insights from Nepal should be applicable to understanding bounds on earthquake size on megathrusts worldwide.
author2 Earth Observatory of Singapore
author_facet Earth Observatory of Singapore
Qiu, Qiang
Hill, Emma Mary
Barbot, Sylvain
Hubbard, Judith
Feng, Wanpeng
Lindsey, Eric Ostrom
Feng, Lujia
Dai, Keren
Samsonov, Sergey V.
Tapponnier, Paul
format Article
author Qiu, Qiang
Hill, Emma Mary
Barbot, Sylvain
Hubbard, Judith
Feng, Wanpeng
Lindsey, Eric Ostrom
Feng, Lujia
Dai, Keren
Samsonov, Sergey V.
Tapponnier, Paul
author_sort Qiu, Qiang
title The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology
title_short The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology
title_full The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology
title_fullStr The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology
title_full_unstemmed The mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: The role of fault morphology
title_sort mechanism of partial rupture of a locked megathrust: the role of fault morphology
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80828
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42246
_version_ 1681057022324244480