Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep
How do we develop programs that are easy to express, easy to reason about, and able to achieve high performance on massively parallel machines? To address this problem, we introduce GraphStep, a domain-specific compute model that captures algorithms that act on static, irregular, sparse graphs. In G...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81195 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39184 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-81195 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-811952020-05-28T07:19:13Z Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep Delorimier, Michael Kapre, Nachiket Mehta, Nikil Dehon, André School of Computer Engineering Languages Spatial computing Compute model Algorithms Performance Parallel programming Graph algorithm graphStep How do we develop programs that are easy to express, easy to reason about, and able to achieve high performance on massively parallel machines? To address this problem, we introduce GraphStep, a domain-specific compute model that captures algorithms that act on static, irregular, sparse graphs. In GraphStep, algorithms are expressed directly without requiring the programmer to explicitly manage parallel synchronization, operation ordering, placement, or scheduling details. Problems in the sparse graph domain are usually highly concurrent and communicate along graph edges. Exposing concurrency and communication structure allows scheduling of parallel operations and management of communication that is necessary for performance on a spatial computer. We study the performance of a semantic network application, a shortest-path application, and a max-flow/min-cut application. We introduce a language syntax for GraphStep applications. The total speedup over sequential versions of the applications studied ranges from a factor of 19 to a factor of 15,000. Spatially-aware graph optimizations (e.g., node decomposition, placement and route scheduling) delivered speedups from 3 to 30 times over a spatially-oblivious mapping. 2015-12-21T04:57:12Z 2019-12-06T14:23:22Z 2015-12-21T04:57:12Z 2019-12-06T14:23:22Z 2011 Journal Article Delorimier, M., Kapre, N., Mehta, N., & Dehon, A. (2011). Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 6(3), 1-20. 1556-4665 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81195 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39184 10.1145/2019583.2019584 en ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems © 2011 Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 20 p. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Languages Spatial computing Compute model Algorithms Performance Parallel programming Graph algorithm graphStep |
spellingShingle |
Languages Spatial computing Compute model Algorithms Performance Parallel programming Graph algorithm graphStep Delorimier, Michael Kapre, Nachiket Mehta, Nikil Dehon, André Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep |
description |
How do we develop programs that are easy to express, easy to reason about, and able to achieve high performance on massively parallel machines? To address this problem, we introduce GraphStep, a domain-specific compute model that captures algorithms that act on static, irregular, sparse graphs. In GraphStep, algorithms are expressed directly without requiring the programmer to explicitly manage parallel synchronization, operation ordering, placement, or scheduling details. Problems in the sparse graph domain are usually highly concurrent and communicate along graph edges. Exposing concurrency and communication structure allows scheduling of parallel operations and management of communication that is necessary for performance on a spatial computer. We study the performance of a semantic network application, a shortest-path application, and a max-flow/min-cut application. We introduce a language syntax for GraphStep applications. The total speedup over sequential versions of the applications studied ranges from a factor of 19 to a factor of 15,000. Spatially-aware graph optimizations (e.g., node decomposition, placement and route scheduling) delivered speedups from 3 to 30 times over a spatially-oblivious mapping. |
author2 |
School of Computer Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Computer Engineering Delorimier, Michael Kapre, Nachiket Mehta, Nikil Dehon, André |
format |
Article |
author |
Delorimier, Michael Kapre, Nachiket Mehta, Nikil Dehon, André |
author_sort |
Delorimier, Michael |
title |
Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep |
title_short |
Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep |
title_full |
Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep |
title_fullStr |
Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in GraphStep |
title_sort |
spatial hardware implementation for sparse graph algorithms in graphstep |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81195 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39184 |
_version_ |
1681056739709943808 |