Pedantic Semantics or Strategic Discourse? The Politics of Talking about Terrorism
The language chosen by leaders to discuss terrorism and extremism has the power to shape and (de)legitimise particular strategic responses. Politically incorrect discourse will only lead to politically incorrect decisions.
Saved in:
Main Author: | Sumpter, Cameron |
---|---|
Other Authors: | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
Format: | Commentary |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81347 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40779 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
CBRN Terrorism : Need for More Deterrence?
by: Ong, Kyler
Published: (2020) -
Buddhist Monks in Myanmar: Driving Religious Intolerance and Hindering Reform
by: Coates, Eliane
Published: (2016) -
Duterte: Delivering the Promised Peace to Mindanao
by: Singh, Bilveer
Published: (2016) -
Avoiding unnecessary radicalization in Bangladesh: learning from pakistan's counter-terrorism experiences in FATA
by: Clarke, Ryan, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Al-Fatihin: Islamic State's first Malay language newspaper
by: Singh, Jasminder, et al.
Published: (2016)