What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task
Literature Review (LR) and Manuscript Preparatory (MP) tasks are two key activities for researchers. While process-based and technologicaloriented interventions have been introduced to bridge the apparent gap between novices and experts for LR tasks, there are very few approaches for MP tasks. I...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81351 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40850 http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1610/paper7.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-81351 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-813512019-12-06T14:29:01Z What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task Foo, Schubert Pang, Natalie Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraies scientific paper recommender systems scientific paper information retrieval manuscript preparation shortlisting citations digital libraries Literature Review (LR) and Manuscript Preparatory (MP) tasks are two key activities for researchers. While process-based and technologicaloriented interventions have been introduced to bridge the apparent gap between novices and experts for LR tasks, there are very few approaches for MP tasks. In this paper, we introduce a novel task of shortlisting important papers from the reading list of researchers, meant for citation in a manuscript. The technique helps in identifying the important and unique papers in the reading list. Based on a user evaluation study conducted with 116 participants, the effectiveness and usefulness of the task is shown using multiple evaluation metrics. Results show that research students prefer this task more than research and academic staff. Qualitative feedback of the participants including the preferred aspects along with critical comments is presented in this paper. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) Accepted version 2016-06-30T04:26:35Z 2019-12-06T14:29:01Z 2016-06-30T04:26:35Z 2019-12-06T14:29:01Z 2016 Conference Paper Sesagiri Raamkumar, A., Foo, S., & Pang, N. (2016). What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task. Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraies, 51–62. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81351 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40850 http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1610/paper7.pdf en © 2016 The Author(s) (published by ACM). This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraies, published by ACM on behalf of the author. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1610/paper7.pdf]. 12 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
scientific paper recommender systems scientific paper information retrieval manuscript preparation shortlisting citations digital libraries |
spellingShingle |
scientific paper recommender systems scientific paper information retrieval manuscript preparation shortlisting citations digital libraries Foo, Schubert Pang, Natalie Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task |
description |
Literature Review (LR) and Manuscript Preparatory (MP) tasks are
two key activities for researchers. While process-based and technologicaloriented
interventions have been introduced to bridge the apparent gap between
novices and experts for LR tasks, there are very few approaches for MP tasks.
In this paper, we introduce a novel task of shortlisting important papers from
the reading list of researchers, meant for citation in a manuscript. The technique
helps in identifying the important and unique papers in the reading list. Based
on a user evaluation study conducted with 116 participants, the effectiveness
and usefulness of the task is shown using multiple evaluation metrics. Results
show that research students prefer this task more than research and academic
staff. Qualitative feedback of the participants including the preferred aspects
along with critical comments is presented in this paper. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Foo, Schubert Pang, Natalie Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Foo, Schubert Pang, Natalie Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind |
author_sort |
Foo, Schubert |
title |
What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task |
title_short |
What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task |
title_full |
What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task |
title_fullStr |
What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task |
title_full_unstemmed |
What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task |
title_sort |
what papers should i cite from my reading list? user evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81351 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40850 http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1610/paper7.pdf |
_version_ |
1681037891855187968 |