What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task

Literature Review (LR) and Manuscript Preparatory (MP) tasks are two key activities for researchers. While process-based and technologicaloriented interventions have been introduced to bridge the apparent gap between novices and experts for LR tasks, there are very few approaches for MP tasks. I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Foo, Schubert, Pang, Natalie, Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81351
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40850
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1610/paper7.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-81351
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-813512019-12-06T14:29:01Z What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task Foo, Schubert Pang, Natalie Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraies scientific paper recommender systems scientific paper information retrieval manuscript preparation shortlisting citations digital libraries Literature Review (LR) and Manuscript Preparatory (MP) tasks are two key activities for researchers. While process-based and technologicaloriented interventions have been introduced to bridge the apparent gap between novices and experts for LR tasks, there are very few approaches for MP tasks. In this paper, we introduce a novel task of shortlisting important papers from the reading list of researchers, meant for citation in a manuscript. The technique helps in identifying the important and unique papers in the reading list. Based on a user evaluation study conducted with 116 participants, the effectiveness and usefulness of the task is shown using multiple evaluation metrics. Results show that research students prefer this task more than research and academic staff. Qualitative feedback of the participants including the preferred aspects along with critical comments is presented in this paper. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) Accepted version 2016-06-30T04:26:35Z 2019-12-06T14:29:01Z 2016-06-30T04:26:35Z 2019-12-06T14:29:01Z 2016 Conference Paper Sesagiri Raamkumar, A., Foo, S., & Pang, N. (2016). What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task. Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraies, 51–62. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81351 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40850 http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1610/paper7.pdf en © 2016 The Author(s) (published by ACM). This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraies, published by ACM on behalf of the author. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document.  The published version is available at: [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1610/paper7.pdf]. 12 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic scientific paper recommender systems
scientific paper information retrieval
manuscript preparation
shortlisting citations
digital libraries
spellingShingle scientific paper recommender systems
scientific paper information retrieval
manuscript preparation
shortlisting citations
digital libraries
Foo, Schubert
Pang, Natalie
Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind
What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task
description Literature Review (LR) and Manuscript Preparatory (MP) tasks are two key activities for researchers. While process-based and technologicaloriented interventions have been introduced to bridge the apparent gap between novices and experts for LR tasks, there are very few approaches for MP tasks. In this paper, we introduce a novel task of shortlisting important papers from the reading list of researchers, meant for citation in a manuscript. The technique helps in identifying the important and unique papers in the reading list. Based on a user evaluation study conducted with 116 participants, the effectiveness and usefulness of the task is shown using multiple evaluation metrics. Results show that research students prefer this task more than research and academic staff. Qualitative feedback of the participants including the preferred aspects along with critical comments is presented in this paper.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Foo, Schubert
Pang, Natalie
Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Foo, Schubert
Pang, Natalie
Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind
author_sort Foo, Schubert
title What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task
title_short What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task
title_full What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task
title_fullStr What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task
title_full_unstemmed What papers should I cite from my reading list? User evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task
title_sort what papers should i cite from my reading list? user evaluation of a manuscript preparatory assistive task
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81351
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40850
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1610/paper7.pdf
_version_ 1681037891855187968