Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective

We consider a multihypothesis social learning problem in which an agent has access to a set of private observations and chooses an opinion from a set of experts to incorporate into its final decision. To model individual biases, we allow the agent and experts to have general loss functions and possi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tay, Wee Peng
Other Authors: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81388
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43460
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-81388
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-813882020-03-07T13:57:25Z Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective Tay, Wee Peng School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Decentralized detection Social learning We consider a multihypothesis social learning problem in which an agent has access to a set of private observations and chooses an opinion from a set of experts to incorporate into its final decision. To model individual biases, we allow the agent and experts to have general loss functions and possibly different decision spaces. We characterize the loss exponents of both the agent and experts, and provide an asymptotically optimal method for the agent to choose the best expert to follow. We show that up to asymptotic equivalence, the worst loss exponent for the agent is achieved when it adopts the 0-1 loss function, which assigns a loss of 0 if the true hypothesis is declared and a loss of 1 otherwise. We introduce the concept of hypothesis-loss neutrality, and show that if the agent adopts a particular policy that is hypothesis-loss neutral, then it ignores all experts whose decision spaces are smaller than its own. On the other hand, if experts have the same decision space as the agent, then choosing an expert with the same loss function as itself is not necessarily optimal for the agent, which is somewhat counter-intuitive. We derive sufficient conditions for when it is optimal for the agent with 0-1 loss function to choose an expert with the same loss function. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Accepted version 2017-07-27T05:15:42Z 2019-12-06T14:29:50Z 2017-07-27T05:15:42Z 2019-12-06T14:29:50Z 2014 Journal Article Tay, W. P. (2015). Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 9(2), 344-359. 1932-4553 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81388 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43460 10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2365757 en IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing © 2014 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2365757]. 16 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Decentralized detection
Social learning
spellingShingle Decentralized detection
Social learning
Tay, Wee Peng
Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective
description We consider a multihypothesis social learning problem in which an agent has access to a set of private observations and chooses an opinion from a set of experts to incorporate into its final decision. To model individual biases, we allow the agent and experts to have general loss functions and possibly different decision spaces. We characterize the loss exponents of both the agent and experts, and provide an asymptotically optimal method for the agent to choose the best expert to follow. We show that up to asymptotic equivalence, the worst loss exponent for the agent is achieved when it adopts the 0-1 loss function, which assigns a loss of 0 if the true hypothesis is declared and a loss of 1 otherwise. We introduce the concept of hypothesis-loss neutrality, and show that if the agent adopts a particular policy that is hypothesis-loss neutral, then it ignores all experts whose decision spaces are smaller than its own. On the other hand, if experts have the same decision space as the agent, then choosing an expert with the same loss function as itself is not necessarily optimal for the agent, which is somewhat counter-intuitive. We derive sufficient conditions for when it is optimal for the agent with 0-1 loss function to choose an expert with the same loss function.
author2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
author_facet School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Tay, Wee Peng
format Article
author Tay, Wee Peng
author_sort Tay, Wee Peng
title Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective
title_short Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective
title_full Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective
title_fullStr Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective
title_sort whose opinion to follow in multihypothesis social learning? a large deviations perspective
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81388
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43460
_version_ 1681046518182707200