Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective
We consider a multihypothesis social learning problem in which an agent has access to a set of private observations and chooses an opinion from a set of experts to incorporate into its final decision. To model individual biases, we allow the agent and experts to have general loss functions and possi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81388 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43460 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-81388 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-813882020-03-07T13:57:25Z Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective Tay, Wee Peng School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Decentralized detection Social learning We consider a multihypothesis social learning problem in which an agent has access to a set of private observations and chooses an opinion from a set of experts to incorporate into its final decision. To model individual biases, we allow the agent and experts to have general loss functions and possibly different decision spaces. We characterize the loss exponents of both the agent and experts, and provide an asymptotically optimal method for the agent to choose the best expert to follow. We show that up to asymptotic equivalence, the worst loss exponent for the agent is achieved when it adopts the 0-1 loss function, which assigns a loss of 0 if the true hypothesis is declared and a loss of 1 otherwise. We introduce the concept of hypothesis-loss neutrality, and show that if the agent adopts a particular policy that is hypothesis-loss neutral, then it ignores all experts whose decision spaces are smaller than its own. On the other hand, if experts have the same decision space as the agent, then choosing an expert with the same loss function as itself is not necessarily optimal for the agent, which is somewhat counter-intuitive. We derive sufficient conditions for when it is optimal for the agent with 0-1 loss function to choose an expert with the same loss function. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Accepted version 2017-07-27T05:15:42Z 2019-12-06T14:29:50Z 2017-07-27T05:15:42Z 2019-12-06T14:29:50Z 2014 Journal Article Tay, W. P. (2015). Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 9(2), 344-359. 1932-4553 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81388 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43460 10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2365757 en IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing © 2014 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2365757]. 16 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Decentralized detection Social learning |
spellingShingle |
Decentralized detection Social learning Tay, Wee Peng Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective |
description |
We consider a multihypothesis social learning problem in which an agent has access to a set of private observations and chooses an opinion from a set of experts to incorporate into its final decision. To model individual biases, we allow the agent and experts to have general loss functions and possibly different decision spaces. We characterize the loss exponents of both the agent and experts, and provide an asymptotically optimal method for the agent to choose the best expert to follow. We show that up to asymptotic equivalence, the worst loss exponent for the agent is achieved when it adopts the 0-1 loss function, which assigns a loss of 0 if the true hypothesis is declared and a loss of 1 otherwise. We introduce the concept of hypothesis-loss neutrality, and show that if the agent adopts a particular policy that is hypothesis-loss neutral, then it ignores all experts whose decision spaces are smaller than its own. On the other hand, if experts have the same decision space as the agent, then choosing an expert with the same loss function as itself is not necessarily optimal for the agent, which is somewhat counter-intuitive. We derive sufficient conditions for when it is optimal for the agent with 0-1 loss function to choose an expert with the same loss function. |
author2 |
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Tay, Wee Peng |
format |
Article |
author |
Tay, Wee Peng |
author_sort |
Tay, Wee Peng |
title |
Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective |
title_short |
Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective |
title_full |
Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective |
title_fullStr |
Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Whose Opinion to Follow in Multihypothesis Social Learning? A Large Deviations Perspective |
title_sort |
whose opinion to follow in multihypothesis social learning? a large deviations perspective |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81388 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43460 |
_version_ |
1681046518182707200 |