A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms

In this paper we study CEO contract design employing a unique dataset on privately-held and public firm CEO annual compensation over the period 1999–2011. We first show that CEOs in public firms are paid 30% more than CEOs in comparable privately-held firms. We further show that both private and pub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gao, Huasheng, Li, Kai
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81582
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39554
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-81582
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-815822023-05-19T06:44:41Z A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms Gao, Huasheng Li, Kai Nanyang Business School Ownership concentration CEO pay Pay–performance sensitivity Privately-held firms In this paper we study CEO contract design employing a unique dataset on privately-held and public firm CEO annual compensation over the period 1999–2011. We first show that CEOs in public firms are paid 30% more than CEOs in comparable privately-held firms. We further show that both private and public firm CEO pays are positively and significantly related to firm accounting performance, and that the pay–performance link is much weaker in privately-held firms. We then show that the above findings are robust to accounting for firms' self-selection into being privately-held, and a number of important differences between privately-held and public firms, including CEO ownership, employee stock ownership, stock liquidity, discipline from the takeover market, and the availability of different performance measures. Overall, our results support the view that concentrated ownership substitutes for CEO performance-based compensation contracts. Accepted version 2016-01-05T03:05:16Z 2019-12-06T14:34:16Z 2016-01-05T03:05:16Z 2019-12-06T14:34:16Z 2015 Journal Article Gao, H., & Li, K. (2015). A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 370-388. 0929-1199 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81582 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39554 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.005 en Journal of Corporate Finance © 2015 Elsevier B.V. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier B.V.. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.005]. 55 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Ownership concentration
CEO pay
Pay–performance sensitivity
Privately-held firms
spellingShingle Ownership concentration
CEO pay
Pay–performance sensitivity
Privately-held firms
Gao, Huasheng
Li, Kai
A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
description In this paper we study CEO contract design employing a unique dataset on privately-held and public firm CEO annual compensation over the period 1999–2011. We first show that CEOs in public firms are paid 30% more than CEOs in comparable privately-held firms. We further show that both private and public firm CEO pays are positively and significantly related to firm accounting performance, and that the pay–performance link is much weaker in privately-held firms. We then show that the above findings are robust to accounting for firms' self-selection into being privately-held, and a number of important differences between privately-held and public firms, including CEO ownership, employee stock ownership, stock liquidity, discipline from the takeover market, and the availability of different performance measures. Overall, our results support the view that concentrated ownership substitutes for CEO performance-based compensation contracts.
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Gao, Huasheng
Li, Kai
format Article
author Gao, Huasheng
Li, Kai
author_sort Gao, Huasheng
title A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
title_short A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
title_full A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
title_fullStr A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
title_sort comparison of ceo pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81582
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39554
_version_ 1770565885636902912