A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms
In this paper we study CEO contract design employing a unique dataset on privately-held and public firm CEO annual compensation over the period 1999–2011. We first show that CEOs in public firms are paid 30% more than CEOs in comparable privately-held firms. We further show that both private and pub...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81582 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39554 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-81582 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-815822023-05-19T06:44:41Z A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms Gao, Huasheng Li, Kai Nanyang Business School Ownership concentration CEO pay Pay–performance sensitivity Privately-held firms In this paper we study CEO contract design employing a unique dataset on privately-held and public firm CEO annual compensation over the period 1999–2011. We first show that CEOs in public firms are paid 30% more than CEOs in comparable privately-held firms. We further show that both private and public firm CEO pays are positively and significantly related to firm accounting performance, and that the pay–performance link is much weaker in privately-held firms. We then show that the above findings are robust to accounting for firms' self-selection into being privately-held, and a number of important differences between privately-held and public firms, including CEO ownership, employee stock ownership, stock liquidity, discipline from the takeover market, and the availability of different performance measures. Overall, our results support the view that concentrated ownership substitutes for CEO performance-based compensation contracts. Accepted version 2016-01-05T03:05:16Z 2019-12-06T14:34:16Z 2016-01-05T03:05:16Z 2019-12-06T14:34:16Z 2015 Journal Article Gao, H., & Li, K. (2015). A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 370-388. 0929-1199 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81582 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39554 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.005 en Journal of Corporate Finance © 2015 Elsevier B.V. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier B.V.. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.005]. 55 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Ownership concentration CEO pay Pay–performance sensitivity Privately-held firms |
spellingShingle |
Ownership concentration CEO pay Pay–performance sensitivity Privately-held firms Gao, Huasheng Li, Kai A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms |
description |
In this paper we study CEO contract design employing a unique dataset on privately-held and public firm CEO annual compensation over the period 1999–2011. We first show that CEOs in public firms are paid 30% more than CEOs in comparable privately-held firms. We further show that both private and public firm CEO pays are positively and significantly related to firm accounting performance, and that the pay–performance link is much weaker in privately-held firms. We then show that the above findings are robust to accounting for firms' self-selection into being privately-held, and a number of important differences between privately-held and public firms, including CEO ownership, employee stock ownership, stock liquidity, discipline from the takeover market, and the availability of different performance measures. Overall, our results support the view that concentrated ownership substitutes for CEO performance-based compensation contracts. |
author2 |
Nanyang Business School |
author_facet |
Nanyang Business School Gao, Huasheng Li, Kai |
format |
Article |
author |
Gao, Huasheng Li, Kai |
author_sort |
Gao, Huasheng |
title |
A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms |
title_short |
A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms |
title_full |
A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of CEO pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms |
title_sort |
comparison of ceo pay–performance sensitivity in privately-held and public firms |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81582 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/39554 |
_version_ |
1770565885636902912 |