Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment

Protein-based cytotoxicity assays such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) are commonly used in cytotoxic evaluation of nanoparticles (NPs) despite numerous reports on possible interactions with protein markers in these assays that can confound the results obtained...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao, Xinxin, Xiong, Sijing, Huang, Liwen Charlotte, Ng, Kee Woei, Loo, Say Chye Joachim
Other Authors: School of Materials Science & Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81771
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40958
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-81771
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-817712020-06-01T10:21:09Z Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment Zhao, Xinxin Xiong, Sijing Huang, Liwen Charlotte Ng, Kee Woei Loo, Say Chye Joachim School of Materials Science & Engineering Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering Nanomaterial LDH assay Protein-based cytotoxicity assays such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) are commonly used in cytotoxic evaluation of nanoparticles (NPs) despite numerous reports on possible interactions with protein markers in these assays that can confound the results obtained. In this study, conventional cytotoxicity assays where assay markers may (LDH and TNF- α) or may not (PicoGreen and WST-8) come into contact with NPs were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of NPs. The findings revealed selective interactions between negatively charged protein assay markers (LDH and TNF- α) and positively charged ZnO NPs under abiotic conditions. The adsorption and interaction with these protein assay markers were strongly influenced by surface charge, concentration, and specific surface area of the NPs, thereby resulting in less than accurate cytotoxic measurements, as observed from actual cell viability measurements. An improved protocol for LDH assay was, therefore, proposed and validated by eliminating any effects associated with protein–particle interactions. In view of this, additional measures and precautions should be taken when evaluating cytotoxicity of NPs with standard protein-based assays, particularly when they are of opposite charges. ASTAR (Agency for Sci., Tech. and Research, S’pore) 2016-07-18T07:56:31Z 2019-12-06T14:40:18Z 2016-07-18T07:56:31Z 2019-12-06T14:40:18Z 2015 Journal Article Zhao, X., Xiong, S., Huang, L. C., Ng, K. W., & Loo, S. C. J. (2015). Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17(13). 1388-0764 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81771 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40958 10.1007/s11051-014-2841-0 en Journal of Nanoparticle Research © 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Nanomaterial
LDH assay
spellingShingle Nanomaterial
LDH assay
Zhao, Xinxin
Xiong, Sijing
Huang, Liwen Charlotte
Ng, Kee Woei
Loo, Say Chye Joachim
Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment
description Protein-based cytotoxicity assays such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) are commonly used in cytotoxic evaluation of nanoparticles (NPs) despite numerous reports on possible interactions with protein markers in these assays that can confound the results obtained. In this study, conventional cytotoxicity assays where assay markers may (LDH and TNF- α) or may not (PicoGreen and WST-8) come into contact with NPs were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of NPs. The findings revealed selective interactions between negatively charged protein assay markers (LDH and TNF- α) and positively charged ZnO NPs under abiotic conditions. The adsorption and interaction with these protein assay markers were strongly influenced by surface charge, concentration, and specific surface area of the NPs, thereby resulting in less than accurate cytotoxic measurements, as observed from actual cell viability measurements. An improved protocol for LDH assay was, therefore, proposed and validated by eliminating any effects associated with protein–particle interactions. In view of this, additional measures and precautions should be taken when evaluating cytotoxicity of NPs with standard protein-based assays, particularly when they are of opposite charges.
author2 School of Materials Science & Engineering
author_facet School of Materials Science & Engineering
Zhao, Xinxin
Xiong, Sijing
Huang, Liwen Charlotte
Ng, Kee Woei
Loo, Say Chye Joachim
format Article
author Zhao, Xinxin
Xiong, Sijing
Huang, Liwen Charlotte
Ng, Kee Woei
Loo, Say Chye Joachim
author_sort Zhao, Xinxin
title Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment
title_short Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment
title_full Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment
title_fullStr Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment
title_full_unstemmed Nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment
title_sort nanoparticle-assay marker interaction: effects on nanotoxicity assessment
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81771
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40958
_version_ 1681057284279500800