What Now for China?
China has chosen not to take part in the arbitral tribunal brought against it by the Philippines. Hence, now that the tribunal has issued its ruling, China should stay away from commenting on the case and instead offer concrete plans for functional cooperation in the South China Sea.
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Commentary |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81776 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41008 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-81776 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-817762020-11-01T07:29:40Z What Now for China? Zha, Daojiong S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies China has chosen not to take part in the arbitral tribunal brought against it by the Philippines. Hence, now that the tribunal has issued its ruling, China should stay away from commenting on the case and instead offer concrete plans for functional cooperation in the South China Sea. 2016-07-27T08:48:24Z 2019-12-06T14:40:24Z 2016-07-27T08:48:24Z 2019-12-06T14:40:24Z 2016 Commentary Zha, D. (2016). What Now for China? (RSIS Commentaries, No. 181). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81776 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41008 en RSIS Commentaries, 181-16 Nanyang Technological University 3 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies |
spellingShingle |
Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies Zha, Daojiong What Now for China? |
description |
China has chosen not to take part in the arbitral tribunal brought against it by the Philippines. Hence, now that the tribunal has issued its ruling, China should stay away from commenting on the case and instead offer concrete plans for functional cooperation in the South China Sea. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Zha, Daojiong |
format |
Commentary |
author |
Zha, Daojiong |
author_sort |
Zha, Daojiong |
title |
What Now for China? |
title_short |
What Now for China? |
title_full |
What Now for China? |
title_fullStr |
What Now for China? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Now for China? |
title_sort |
what now for china? |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81776 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41008 |
_version_ |
1683494066522685440 |