重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s

The end of the Cold War and the implosion of the Soviet Union, the Tiananmen Incident of June 1989, and the initiation of the second reform period with Deng Xiaoping’s Southern Tour (nanxun) in early 1992 urged Chinese intellectuals to rewrite modern Chinese history. Even though scholars such as Li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: van Dongen, Els
Other Authors: 复旦大学文史研究院
Format: Book Chapter
Language:Chinese
Published: Zhonghua Book Company 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82650
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40273
http://www.iahs.fudan.edu.cn/cn/publications.asp?class_id=35&id=44
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: Chinese
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-82650
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-826502020-07-02T08:35:24Z 重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s van Dongen, Els 复旦大学文史研究院 School of Humanities and Social Sciences China Intellectual history Radicalism May Fourth Movement The end of the Cold War and the implosion of the Soviet Union, the Tiananmen Incident of June 1989, and the initiation of the second reform period with Deng Xiaoping’s Southern Tour (nanxun) in early 1992 urged Chinese intellectuals to rewrite modern Chinese history. Even though scholars such as Li Zehou and Liu Zaifu famously said “goodbye to revolution” (gaobie geming) in 1995, the rewriting of history also took the form of rejections of “radicalism” (jijin zhuyi) as a reform strategy. Several scholars identified “radicalism” as the core trait of what is perhaps twentieth-China’s most famous intellectual, cultural, and political movement: the May Fourth Movement. Disclaiming the May Fourth heritage, rejections of “radicalism” characterized the thought of neo-conservatives, New Confucians, and cultural nationalists alike. The chapter discusses some of the manifestations of “anti-radicalism” of the early 1990s and argues that even though they are not representative of a conservative trend because the notion of progress remained unquestioned in the context of transition and crisis, they do reveal an important turn towards the concern with historical continuity that is still visible today. 2016-03-15T03:23:01Z 2019-12-06T14:59:42Z 2016-03-15T03:23:01Z 2019-12-06T14:59:42Z 2013 Book Chapter van Dongen, E. (2013). 重写中国近代史: 二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history: echoing the modern during the early 1990s. In Fudan Daxue Wenshi Yanjiuyuan (Ed), 《民族认同与历史意识: 审视近现代日本与中国的历史学与现代性》,Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 213-225. 978-7-101-09305-6 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82650 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40273 http://www.iahs.fudan.edu.cn/cn/publications.asp?class_id=35&id=44 zh © 2013 复旦大学文史研究院 National Institute for Advanced Humanistic Studies. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in 民族认同与历史意识: 审视近现代日本与中国的历史学与现代性, published by Zhonghua Book Company on behalf of 复旦大学文史研究院 National Institute for Advanced Humanistic Studies. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document.  13 p. application/pdf Zhonghua Book Company
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language Chinese
topic China
Intellectual history
Radicalism
May Fourth Movement
spellingShingle China
Intellectual history
Radicalism
May Fourth Movement
van Dongen, Els
重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s
description The end of the Cold War and the implosion of the Soviet Union, the Tiananmen Incident of June 1989, and the initiation of the second reform period with Deng Xiaoping’s Southern Tour (nanxun) in early 1992 urged Chinese intellectuals to rewrite modern Chinese history. Even though scholars such as Li Zehou and Liu Zaifu famously said “goodbye to revolution” (gaobie geming) in 1995, the rewriting of history also took the form of rejections of “radicalism” (jijin zhuyi) as a reform strategy. Several scholars identified “radicalism” as the core trait of what is perhaps twentieth-China’s most famous intellectual, cultural, and political movement: the May Fourth Movement. Disclaiming the May Fourth heritage, rejections of “radicalism” characterized the thought of neo-conservatives, New Confucians, and cultural nationalists alike. The chapter discusses some of the manifestations of “anti-radicalism” of the early 1990s and argues that even though they are not representative of a conservative trend because the notion of progress remained unquestioned in the context of transition and crisis, they do reveal an important turn towards the concern with historical continuity that is still visible today.
author2 复旦大学文史研究院
author_facet 复旦大学文史研究院
van Dongen, Els
format Book Chapter
author van Dongen, Els
author_sort van Dongen, Els
title 重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s
title_short 重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s
title_full 重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s
title_fullStr 重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s
title_full_unstemmed 重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = Rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s
title_sort 重写中国近代史:二十世纪九十年代早期对现代性的回应 = rewriting modern chinese history : echoing the modern during the early 1990s
publisher Zhonghua Book Company
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82650
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40273
http://www.iahs.fudan.edu.cn/cn/publications.asp?class_id=35&id=44
_version_ 1681057160038973440