Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis
Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and his “America First” trade agenda ignite a second round of interest in mega-free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. Countries are evaluating alternative trade policy actions in a post-TPP era. Using national real GDP gains estimated b...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82750 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49086 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-82750 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-827502020-03-07T12:53:24Z Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis Ji, Xianbai Rana, Pradumna Bickram Chia, Wai-Mun Li, Changtai School of Social Sciences S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies RCEP Post-TPP Social sciences::Political science Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and his “America First” trade agenda ignite a second round of interest in mega-free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. Countries are evaluating alternative trade policy actions in a post-TPP era. Using national real GDP gains estimated by a modified GTAP model to construct “preference ordering” for 10 Association of Southeast Asian Nations members and their six regional dialogue partners, this paper comes up with several policy-oriented findings. First, when multilateral agreements are not possible, countries are better off with a regional trading agreement than without one. Second, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership is likely to have higher beneficial impacts than the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Third, for dual-track countries, implementing both agreements is better than each separately. Fourth, impacts of open regionalism are likely to be higher than those of a closed and reciprocal one. Going forward, this paper argues that countries should adopt a “multi-track, multi-stage” approach to trade policy. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Published version 2019-07-02T08:25:09Z 2019-12-06T15:04:46Z 2019-07-02T08:25:09Z 2019-12-06T15:04:46Z 2018 Journal Article Ji, X., Rana, P. B., Chia, W.-M., & Li, C. (2018). Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis. East Asian Economic Review, 22(2), 177-215. doi:10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018.22.2.342 2508-1640 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82750 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49086 10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018.22.2.342 en East Asian Economic Review © 2018 EAER is an open access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license. 39 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
RCEP Post-TPP Social sciences::Political science |
spellingShingle |
RCEP Post-TPP Social sciences::Political science Ji, Xianbai Rana, Pradumna Bickram Chia, Wai-Mun Li, Changtai Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis |
description |
Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and his “America First” trade agenda ignite a second round of interest in mega-free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. Countries are evaluating alternative trade policy actions in a post-TPP era. Using national real GDP gains estimated by a modified GTAP model to construct “preference ordering” for 10 Association of Southeast Asian Nations members and their six regional dialogue partners, this paper comes up with several policy-oriented findings. First, when multilateral agreements are not possible, countries are better off with a regional trading agreement than without one. Second, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership is likely to have higher beneficial impacts than the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Third, for dual-track countries, implementing both agreements is better than each separately. Fourth, impacts of open regionalism are likely to be higher than those of a closed and reciprocal one. Going forward, this paper argues that countries should adopt a “multi-track, multi-stage” approach to trade policy. |
author2 |
School of Social Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Social Sciences Ji, Xianbai Rana, Pradumna Bickram Chia, Wai-Mun Li, Changtai |
format |
Article |
author |
Ji, Xianbai Rana, Pradumna Bickram Chia, Wai-Mun Li, Changtai |
author_sort |
Ji, Xianbai |
title |
Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis |
title_short |
Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis |
title_full |
Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis |
title_fullStr |
Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis |
title_sort |
post-tpp trade policy options for asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using cge analysis |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82750 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49086 |
_version_ |
1681043533979451392 |