Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis

Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and his “America First” trade agenda ignite a second round of interest in mega-free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. Countries are evaluating alternative trade policy actions in a post-TPP era. Using national real GDP gains estimated b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ji, Xianbai, Rana, Pradumna Bickram, Chia, Wai-Mun, Li, Changtai
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82750
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49086
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-82750
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-827502020-03-07T12:53:24Z Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis Ji, Xianbai Rana, Pradumna Bickram Chia, Wai-Mun Li, Changtai School of Social Sciences S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies RCEP Post-TPP Social sciences::Political science Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and his “America First” trade agenda ignite a second round of interest in mega-free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. Countries are evaluating alternative trade policy actions in a post-TPP era. Using national real GDP gains estimated by a modified GTAP model to construct “preference ordering” for 10 Association of Southeast Asian Nations members and their six regional dialogue partners, this paper comes up with several policy-oriented findings. First, when multilateral agreements are not possible, countries are better off with a regional trading agreement than without one. Second, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership is likely to have higher beneficial impacts than the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Third, for dual-track countries, implementing both agreements is better than each separately. Fourth, impacts of open regionalism are likely to be higher than those of a closed and reciprocal one. Going forward, this paper argues that countries should adopt a “multi-track, multi-stage” approach to trade policy. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Published version 2019-07-02T08:25:09Z 2019-12-06T15:04:46Z 2019-07-02T08:25:09Z 2019-12-06T15:04:46Z 2018 Journal Article Ji, X., Rana, P. B., Chia, W.-M., & Li, C. (2018). Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis. East Asian Economic Review, 22(2), 177-215. doi:10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018.22.2.342 2508-1640 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82750 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49086 10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018.22.2.342 en East Asian Economic Review © 2018 EAER is an open access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license. 39 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic RCEP
Post-TPP
Social sciences::Political science
spellingShingle RCEP
Post-TPP
Social sciences::Political science
Ji, Xianbai
Rana, Pradumna Bickram
Chia, Wai-Mun
Li, Changtai
Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis
description Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and his “America First” trade agenda ignite a second round of interest in mega-free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific. Countries are evaluating alternative trade policy actions in a post-TPP era. Using national real GDP gains estimated by a modified GTAP model to construct “preference ordering” for 10 Association of Southeast Asian Nations members and their six regional dialogue partners, this paper comes up with several policy-oriented findings. First, when multilateral agreements are not possible, countries are better off with a regional trading agreement than without one. Second, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership is likely to have higher beneficial impacts than the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Third, for dual-track countries, implementing both agreements is better than each separately. Fourth, impacts of open regionalism are likely to be higher than those of a closed and reciprocal one. Going forward, this paper argues that countries should adopt a “multi-track, multi-stage” approach to trade policy.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Ji, Xianbai
Rana, Pradumna Bickram
Chia, Wai-Mun
Li, Changtai
format Article
author Ji, Xianbai
Rana, Pradumna Bickram
Chia, Wai-Mun
Li, Changtai
author_sort Ji, Xianbai
title Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis
title_short Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis
title_full Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis
title_fullStr Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis
title_full_unstemmed Post-TPP trade policy options for Asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using CGE analysis
title_sort post-tpp trade policy options for asean and its dialogue partners : “preference ordering” using cge analysis
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82750
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49086
_version_ 1681043533979451392