To call a cloud ‘cirrus’: sound symbolism in names for categories or items
The aim of the present paper is to experimentally test whether sound symbolism has selective effects on labels with different ranges-of-reference within a simple nounhierarchy. In two experiments, adult participants learned the make up of two categories of unfamiliar objects (‘alien life forms’),...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83791 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42782 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The aim of the present paper is to experimentally test whether sound symbolism has
selective effects on labels with different ranges-of-reference within a simple nounhierarchy.
In two experiments, adult participants learned the make up of two categories
of unfamiliar objects (‘alien life forms’), and were passively exposed to either categorylabels
or item-labels, in a learning-by-guessing categorization task. Following category
training, participants were tested on their visual discrimination of object pairs. For
different groups of participants, the labels were either congruent or incongruent with
the objects. In Experiment 1, when trained on items with individual labels, participants
were worse (made more errors) at detecting visual object mismatches when trained
labels were incongruent. In Experiment 2, when participants were trained on items in
labelled categories, participants were faster at detecting a match if the trained labels were
congruent, and faster at detecting a mismatch if the trained labels were incongruent.
This pattern of results suggests that sound symbolism in category labels facilitates later
similarity judgments when congruent, and discrimination when incongruent, whereas
for item labels incongruence generates error in judgements of visual object differences.
These findings reveal that sound symbolic congruence has a different outcome at
different levels of labelling within a noun hierarchy. These effects emerged in the absence
of the label itself, indicating subtle but pervasive effects on visual object processing. |
---|