Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN
Despite declaring the ASEAN Community to come into effect on 31 December 2015, ASEAN is not a security community. This article demonstrates this by firstly identifying three models of the security community, the Deutschian, the constructivist, and the instrumental models and subsequently applying th...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84678 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41903 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-84678 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-846782023-03-04T17:15:43Z Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN Chang, Jun Yan S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies ASEAN Security Community Despite declaring the ASEAN Community to come into effect on 31 December 2015, ASEAN is not a security community. This article demonstrates this by firstly identifying three models of the security community, the Deutschian, the constructivist, and the instrumental models and subsequently applying these to ASEAN. Although the paradox of the ‘long peace’ of ASEAN seems to be validated by the latter, such is mistaking effect for cause. Through a process of critique, the shortfalls of the models are highlighted and consequently addressed through conjoining Critical Security Studies to the ‘security community’ concept in a Model IV critical security community formulation to achieve a holistic and comprehensive concept relevant to the world today. Employing this to assess ASEAN, the puzzle of whether ASEAN is a security community is laid to rest; its security is not truly comprehensive, its people are not emancipated, and its various domestic and transnational instabilities affect it adversely. Accepted version 2016-12-20T09:12:29Z 2019-12-06T15:49:21Z 2016-12-20T09:12:29Z 2019-12-06T15:49:21Z 2016 Journal Article Chang, J. Y. (2016). Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 16(3), 335-369. 1470-482X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84678 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41903 10.1093/irap/lcv026 en International Relations of the Asia-Pacific © 2016 The author. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, published by Oxford University Press in association with the Japan Association of International Relations on behalf of the author. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcv026]. 22 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
ASEAN Security Community |
spellingShingle |
ASEAN Security Community Chang, Jun Yan Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN |
description |
Despite declaring the ASEAN Community to come into effect on 31 December 2015, ASEAN is not a security community. This article demonstrates this by firstly identifying three models of the security community, the Deutschian, the constructivist, and the instrumental models and subsequently applying these to ASEAN. Although the paradox of the ‘long peace’ of ASEAN seems to be validated by the latter, such is mistaking effect for cause. Through a process of critique, the shortfalls of the models are highlighted and consequently addressed through conjoining Critical Security Studies to the ‘security community’ concept in a Model IV critical security community formulation to achieve a holistic and comprehensive concept relevant to the world today. Employing this to assess ASEAN, the puzzle of whether ASEAN is a security community is laid to rest; its security is not truly comprehensive, its people are not emancipated, and its various domestic and transnational instabilities affect it adversely. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Chang, Jun Yan |
format |
Article |
author |
Chang, Jun Yan |
author_sort |
Chang, Jun Yan |
title |
Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN |
title_short |
Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN |
title_full |
Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN |
title_fullStr |
Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN |
title_full_unstemmed |
Essence of security communities: explaining ASEAN |
title_sort |
essence of security communities: explaining asean |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84678 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41903 |
_version_ |
1759857550896922624 |