No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses

No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses

The present research tested two competing hypotheses: (1) as money cues activate an exchange orientation to social relations, money cues harm prosocial responses in communal and collectivistic settings; (2) as money can be used to help close others, money cues increase helping in communal or collect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Savani, Krishna, Mead, Nicole L., Stillman, Tyler, Vohs, Kathleen D.
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Helping
Money
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85131
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43616
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-85131
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-851312023-05-19T06:44:42Z No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses Savani, Krishna Mead, Nicole L. Stillman, Tyler Vohs, Kathleen D. Nanyang Business School Helping Money The present research tested two competing hypotheses: (1) as money cues activate an exchange orientation to social relations, money cues harm prosocial responses in communal and collectivistic settings; (2) as money can be used to help close others, money cues increase helping in communal or collectivistic settings. In a culture, characterized by strong helping norms, money cues reduced the quality of help given (Experiment 1), and lowered perceived moral obligation to help (Experiment 2). In communal relationships, money reminders decreased willingness to help romantic partners (Experiment 3). This effect was attenuated among people high on communal strength, although money cues made them upset with help requests (Experiment 4). Thus, the harmful effects of money on prosocial responses appear robust. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Accepted version 2017-08-21T08:34:54Z 2019-12-06T15:57:43Z 2017-08-21T08:34:54Z 2019-12-06T15:57:43Z 2016 Journal Article Savani, K., Mead, N. L., Stillman, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses. Self and Identity, 15(3), 342-355. 1529-8868 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85131 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43616 10.1080/15298868.2015.1133451 en Self and Identity © 2016 Taylor & Francis. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Self and Identity, Taylor & Francis. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.1133451]. 32 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Helping
Money
spellingShingle Helping
Money
Savani, Krishna
Mead, Nicole L.
Stillman, Tyler
Vohs, Kathleen D.
No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses
description The present research tested two competing hypotheses: (1) as money cues activate an exchange orientation to social relations, money cues harm prosocial responses in communal and collectivistic settings; (2) as money can be used to help close others, money cues increase helping in communal or collectivistic settings. In a culture, characterized by strong helping norms, money cues reduced the quality of help given (Experiment 1), and lowered perceived moral obligation to help (Experiment 2). In communal relationships, money reminders decreased willingness to help romantic partners (Experiment 3). This effect was attenuated among people high on communal strength, although money cues made them upset with help requests (Experiment 4). Thus, the harmful effects of money on prosocial responses appear robust.
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Savani, Krishna
Mead, Nicole L.
Stillman, Tyler
Vohs, Kathleen D.
format Article
author Savani, Krishna
Mead, Nicole L.
Stillman, Tyler
Vohs, Kathleen D.
author_sort Savani, Krishna
title No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses
title_short No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses
title_full No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses
title_fullStr No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses
title_full_unstemmed No match for money: Even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses
title_sort no match for money: even in intimate relationships and collectivistic cultures, reminders of money weaken sociomoral responses
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85131
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43616
_version_ 1770564431039692800

Similar Items