Frankenstein journalism
Confronted with circumstances altered by the Internet, professional working practices have the option to change or to stay the same. This paper looks at how newsworkers in the new form of digital newsrooms have adapted the old location- or topic-based ‘beat’ system; now that they are called upon to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85315 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43689 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-85315 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-853152020-03-07T12:15:50Z Frankenstein journalism Duffy, Andrew Tandoc, Edson C. Ling, Richard Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Gatekeeping Ritual DRNTU::Social sciences::Journalism Confronted with circumstances altered by the Internet, professional working practices have the option to change or to stay the same. This paper looks at how newsworkers in the new form of digital newsrooms have adapted the old location- or topic-based ‘beat’ system; now that they are called upon to curate or aggregate news stories which arrive fully formed from legacy news websites or emerge from social media. Stories like these are often valued for their virality – that is, how far and fast they have already spread – and their power to attract clicks from readers. Today, a growing number of news websites aggregate or curate such stories as part of their own news offerings. Yet curating these stories bring challenges to journalists’ identities and work practices, which demands a response. Based on an ethnographic study of eight digital newsrooms, we report how newsworkers use journalistic rituals to legitimise these second-hand stories flowing into the newsroom. We observed the use of rituals of objectivity, multiple sourcing and comparison with other news outlets as mechanisms that newsworkers used to validate and justify their use of second-hand content. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Accepted version 2017-09-05T07:56:59Z 2019-12-06T16:01:22Z 2017-09-05T07:56:59Z 2019-12-06T16:01:22Z 2017 Journal Article Duffy, A., Tandoc, E. C., & Ling, R. (2018). Frankenstein journalism. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1354-1368. Doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313884 1369-118X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85315 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43689 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313884 en Information, Communication & Society © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Information, Communication & Society on 17 Apr 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313884. 22 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Gatekeeping Ritual DRNTU::Social sciences::Journalism |
spellingShingle |
Gatekeeping Ritual DRNTU::Social sciences::Journalism Duffy, Andrew Tandoc, Edson C. Ling, Richard Frankenstein journalism |
description |
Confronted with circumstances altered by the Internet, professional working practices have the option to change or to stay the same. This paper looks at how newsworkers in the new form of digital newsrooms have adapted the old location- or topic-based ‘beat’ system; now that they are called upon to curate or aggregate news stories which arrive fully formed from legacy news websites or emerge from social media. Stories like these are often valued for their virality – that is, how far and fast they have already spread – and their power to attract clicks from readers. Today, a growing number of news websites aggregate or curate such stories as part of their own news offerings. Yet curating these stories bring challenges to journalists’ identities and work practices, which demands a response. Based on an ethnographic study of eight digital newsrooms, we report how newsworkers use journalistic rituals to legitimise these second-hand stories flowing into the newsroom. We observed the use of rituals of objectivity, multiple sourcing and comparison with other news outlets as mechanisms that newsworkers used to validate and justify their use of second-hand content. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Duffy, Andrew Tandoc, Edson C. Ling, Richard |
format |
Article |
author |
Duffy, Andrew Tandoc, Edson C. Ling, Richard |
author_sort |
Duffy, Andrew |
title |
Frankenstein journalism |
title_short |
Frankenstein journalism |
title_full |
Frankenstein journalism |
title_fullStr |
Frankenstein journalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Frankenstein journalism |
title_sort |
frankenstein journalism |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85315 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43689 |
_version_ |
1681038615378919424 |