Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls

Structured, intergroup communication that occurs in a deliberative discussion context can be an effective method for improving intergroup relations. Conceptualizing this unique kind of communication as deliberative contact, this study experimentally examined its effect and mechanisms based on two De...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fishkin, James S., Luskin, Robert C., Kim, Nuri
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85360
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49685
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-85360
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-853602020-03-07T12:15:50Z Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls Fishkin, James S. Luskin, Robert C. Kim, Nuri Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Deliberation Intergroup Contact Social sciences::Communication Structured, intergroup communication that occurs in a deliberative discussion context can be an effective method for improving intergroup relations. Conceptualizing this unique kind of communication as deliberative contact, this study experimentally examined its effect and mechanisms based on two Deliberative Polling projects, conducted in two different countries: Australia (N = 339) and Bulgaria (N = 230). Results indicated that deliberative contact with a minority group member during small-group discussions increased support for policies that were beneficial to the minority group. This effect of deliberative contact was marginally stronger among those who had more negative contact experiences with the minority group in the past. Furthermore, deliberative contact effects were mediated by altered perceptions about the minority group’s structural disadvantages in society, but not by an increase in factual knowledge about the outgroup. Published version 2019-08-20T02:23:44Z 2019-12-06T16:02:26Z 2019-08-20T02:23:44Z 2019-12-06T16:02:26Z 2018 Journal Article Kim, N., Fishkin, J. S., & Luskin, R. C. (2018). Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1029-1051. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy056 0021-9916 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85360 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49685 10.1093/joc/jqy056 en Journal of Communication © 2018 The Author(s). All rights reserved. This paper was published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Communication Association in Journal of Communication and is made available with permission of The Author(s). 23 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Deliberation
Intergroup Contact
Social sciences::Communication
spellingShingle Deliberation
Intergroup Contact
Social sciences::Communication
Fishkin, James S.
Luskin, Robert C.
Kim, Nuri
Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls
description Structured, intergroup communication that occurs in a deliberative discussion context can be an effective method for improving intergroup relations. Conceptualizing this unique kind of communication as deliberative contact, this study experimentally examined its effect and mechanisms based on two Deliberative Polling projects, conducted in two different countries: Australia (N = 339) and Bulgaria (N = 230). Results indicated that deliberative contact with a minority group member during small-group discussions increased support for policies that were beneficial to the minority group. This effect of deliberative contact was marginally stronger among those who had more negative contact experiences with the minority group in the past. Furthermore, deliberative contact effects were mediated by altered perceptions about the minority group’s structural disadvantages in society, but not by an increase in factual knowledge about the outgroup.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Fishkin, James S.
Luskin, Robert C.
Kim, Nuri
format Article
author Fishkin, James S.
Luskin, Robert C.
Kim, Nuri
author_sort Fishkin, James S.
title Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls
title_short Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls
title_full Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls
title_fullStr Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls
title_full_unstemmed Intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls
title_sort intergroup contact in deliberative contexts : evidence from deliberative polls
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85360
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49685
_version_ 1681046249463087104