The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach
This Working Paper examines the South China Sea disputes and primarily focuses on developments since 2013 when the Philippines filed for international arbitration. The first part of the paper examines how the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China reacted to the arbitral process an...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85477 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43715 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-85477 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-854772020-11-01T08:45:45Z The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach Roberts, Christopher S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies This Working Paper examines the South China Sea disputes and primarily focuses on developments since 2013 when the Philippines filed for international arbitration. The first part of the paper examines how the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China reacted to the arbitral process and the potential for the Association to undertake an effective and unified position in the future. The second part of the article builds on the analysis by assessing the prospects for, and likely impact of, the long-sought Code of Conduct. In the process, it examines the continued viability of ASEAN’s consensus-based decision-making approach, whether and how it could be reformed, and the potential benefits and viability of a new institutional arrangement with membership based on shared values and interests (rather than geography). The paper also argues that to enhance the possibility of redress on the issue, other key stakeholder states (such as Japan, Australia, India, and the United States) will need to be more strongly engaged and support claimant countries through a diverse array of activities. Such activities range from investments in capacity building to the provision of coastguards (if invited) to police and protect resources within the Exclusive Economic Zones of claimant states, as clarified by the July 2016 Arbitral Ruling. 2017-09-11T06:49:53Z 2019-12-06T16:04:28Z 2017-09-11T06:49:53Z 2019-12-06T16:04:28Z 2017 Working Paper Roberts, C. (2017). The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 307). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85477 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43715 en RSIS Working Papers, 307-17 Nanyang Technological University 33 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies |
spellingShingle |
Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies Roberts, Christopher The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach |
description |
This Working Paper examines the South China Sea disputes and primarily focuses on developments since 2013 when the Philippines filed for international arbitration. The first part of the paper examines how the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China reacted to the arbitral process and the potential for the Association to undertake an effective and unified position in the future. The second part of the article builds on the analysis by assessing the prospects for, and likely impact of, the long-sought Code of Conduct. In the process, it examines the continued viability of ASEAN’s consensus-based decision-making approach, whether and how it could be reformed, and the potential benefits and viability of a new institutional arrangement with membership based on shared values and interests (rather than geography). The paper also argues that to enhance the possibility of redress on the issue, other key stakeholder states (such as Japan, Australia, India, and the United States) will need to be more strongly engaged and support claimant countries through a diverse array of activities. Such activities range from investments in capacity building to the provision of coastguards (if invited) to police and protect resources within the Exclusive Economic Zones of claimant states, as clarified by the July 2016 Arbitral Ruling. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Roberts, Christopher |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Roberts, Christopher |
author_sort |
Roberts, Christopher |
title |
The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach |
title_short |
The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach |
title_full |
The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach |
title_fullStr |
The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach |
title_sort |
south china sea: beijing’s challenge to asean and unclos and the necessity of a new multi-tiered approach |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85477 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43715 |
_version_ |
1688665441338130432 |