A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses
The decommissioning of offshore structures around the world will be a persisting problem in the coming decades as many structures will exceed their shelf life, or when reservoirs are no longer productive. This paper examines an overview of the global offshore decommissioning legal regime, and a summ...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86016 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48294 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-86016 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-860162023-03-04T17:16:07Z A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses Fam, Mei Ling Konovessis, Dimitris Tan, Hoon Kiang Ong, Lin Seng School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Lloyd's Register Global Technology Centre Singapore Institute of Technology DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering Offshore Decommissioning Regulations The decommissioning of offshore structures around the world will be a persisting problem in the coming decades as many structures will exceed their shelf life, or when reservoirs are no longer productive. This paper examines an overview of the global offshore decommissioning legal regime, and a summary of regulations in countries that are deemed to be more experienced in decommissioning such as the UK, Norway and USA. Two oil-producing countries in South East Asia, Malaysia and Thailand are also reviewed to identify potential gaps in decommissioning legislation for countries in its infancy in decommissioning. The differences were identified in terms of decommissioning preparation, decommissioning technical execution, additional environmental requirements and financial security framework. In conclusion, the majority of the regulations covering the technical section are similar within all countries studied. Major differences lie in two overarching philosophies of the framework - a prescriptive regime versus a goal-setting regime. Other decommissioning aspects appear to attract increasing attention, such as in expanding clarity on in situ decommissioning, residual liabilities, optimising finance related issues of decommissioning and offshore to onshore waste movement. These gaps in the existing framework can be filled by taking an evidence-based stand in developing the framework. EDB (Economic Devt. Board, S’pore) Accepted version 2019-05-21T07:08:49Z 2019-12-06T16:14:25Z 2019-05-21T07:08:49Z 2019-12-06T16:14:25Z 2018 Journal Article Fam, M. L., Konovessis, D., Ong, L. S., & Tan, H. K. (2018). A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses. Ocean Engineering, 160, 244-263. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.001. 0029-8018 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86016 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48294 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.001 en Ocean Engineering © 2018 Elsevier. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Ocean Engineering and is made available with permission of Elsevier. 94 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering Offshore Decommissioning Regulations |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering Offshore Decommissioning Regulations Fam, Mei Ling Konovessis, Dimitris Tan, Hoon Kiang Ong, Lin Seng A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses |
description |
The decommissioning of offshore structures around the world will be a persisting problem in the coming decades as many structures will exceed their shelf life, or when reservoirs are no longer productive. This paper examines an overview of the global offshore decommissioning legal regime, and a summary of regulations in countries that are deemed to be more experienced in decommissioning such as the UK, Norway and USA. Two oil-producing countries in South East Asia, Malaysia and Thailand are also reviewed to identify potential gaps in decommissioning legislation for countries in its infancy in decommissioning. The differences were identified in terms of decommissioning preparation, decommissioning technical execution, additional environmental requirements and financial security framework. In conclusion, the majority of the regulations covering the technical section are similar within all countries studied. Major differences lie in two overarching philosophies of the framework - a prescriptive regime versus a goal-setting regime. Other decommissioning aspects appear to attract increasing attention, such as in expanding clarity on in situ decommissioning, residual liabilities, optimising finance related issues of decommissioning and offshore to onshore waste movement. These gaps in the existing framework can be filled by taking an evidence-based stand in developing the framework. |
author2 |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Fam, Mei Ling Konovessis, Dimitris Tan, Hoon Kiang Ong, Lin Seng |
format |
Article |
author |
Fam, Mei Ling Konovessis, Dimitris Tan, Hoon Kiang Ong, Lin Seng |
author_sort |
Fam, Mei Ling |
title |
A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses |
title_short |
A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses |
title_full |
A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses |
title_fullStr |
A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses |
title_full_unstemmed |
A review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses |
title_sort |
review of offshore decommissioning regulations in five countries – strengths and weaknesses |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86016 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48294 |
_version_ |
1759858045852057600 |