Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach

Good clinical communication is increasingly recognised as pivotal to the success of medical practice, with much research having shown that the quality of communication greatly influences such factors as patient satisfaction and eventual health outcomes. Yet while communication skills training has al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ng, Gim Thia
Other Authors: K. K. Luke
Format: Theses and Dissertations
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86104
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49850
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-86104
record_format dspace
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Humanities::Linguistics::Discourse analysis
Humanities::General::Education
spellingShingle Humanities::Linguistics::Discourse analysis
Humanities::General::Education
Ng, Gim Thia
Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach
description Good clinical communication is increasingly recognised as pivotal to the success of medical practice, with much research having shown that the quality of communication greatly influences such factors as patient satisfaction and eventual health outcomes. Yet while communication skills training has already been widely incorporated into the curricula of medical schools around the world, doctors and other healthcare practitioners have mindsets so deeply entrenched in biomedicine that the human dimension continues to be side-lined in healthcare delivery. It is no wonder, then, that clinicians continue to struggle in their medical interactions on an everyday basis, despite the increased focus on patient-centred care globally. By examining clinical communication training with simulated patients (SP) in a young medical school in Singapore, this thesis aims to reflect and reflect upon the current efforts of medical educators endeavouring in the field. Video recordings of SP-based simulation training were collected from the school’s Clinical Communication Practicum for third-year undergraduate medical students. Using the emic, qualitative methodology of Conversation Analysis, these interactions were analysed via detailed inspection of the video data aided by transcriptions made from these recordings according to Jeffersonian conventions. Comprising a total of six simulated scenarios and 18 students, over five hours of footage was transcribed and analysed from a larger corpus of twice the size. Each session encompasses a simulated consultation between a student and an SP, as well as a facilitator-led feedback discussion involving both parties and other students. A scrutiny of the simulated consultations shows that the delivery and explanation of patient diagnoses and/or conditions follow largely similar trajectories. Students begin by first stating their intent, before attempting to establish the SP’s prior knowledge about the diagnosis/condition. Leveraging on this in the actual delivery, they then give an account of its causes and symptoms. Later, in explaining the diagnostic and/or treatment plan, they often make use of strategies such as signposting to construct a methodical framework. Nevertheless, the overall organisation of the consultation ultimately varies according to the scenario in question. Two scenarios that are considerably different from the rest separately required students to dissuade an SP against hospital discharge and persuade a senior colleague to conduct a diagnostic test. Across the board, however, the students’ consultations are characterised by two pervasive features: (1) an orientation towards information sharing over empathic understanding, and (2) an inadequacy in their calibration of language use. The feedback discussion then commences after the simulated consultation is complete. Facilitators guide this second segment using Pendleton’s rules as the adopted framework, which required them to garner feedback from all participants in terms of “what was done well” and “what could be improved”. The analysis shows this structured approach as both a boon and a bane for student learning. While facilitators’ stringent adherence to the rules ensure that students receive feedback from all parties, it subjects the discussion to a rigid configuration that limits input to certain forms which may otherwise turn out more substantial with free debate. On the other hand, when facilitators do not formulate their guiding prompts in a manner that clearly demarcates the two questions, feedback received is either imbalanced or imprecise. Skilful use of the rules in facilitation is therefore needed to ensure that students receive (and themselves produce) rich feedback that enhances their learning. From the various findings, recommendations have been made to improve the teaching and learning of clinical communication in medical education. These target the design of the scenarios, representations made by SPs and students, the role of facilitators, and the use of the data as teaching materials. Nonetheless, caution must be exercised in implementation to ensure that these suggestions do not culminate in yet another prescriptive framework, but instead benefit SP training participants by raising their awareness of different conversational approaches and aiding them in deploying their own strategies of handling clinical interactions.
author2 K. K. Luke
author_facet K. K. Luke
Ng, Gim Thia
format Theses and Dissertations
author Ng, Gim Thia
author_sort Ng, Gim Thia
title Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach
title_short Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach
title_full Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach
title_fullStr Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach
title_full_unstemmed Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach
title_sort clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86104
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49850
_version_ 1683494123011571712
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-861042020-10-28T08:29:16Z Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach Ng, Gim Thia K. K. Luke School of Humanities Humanities::Linguistics::Discourse analysis Humanities::General::Education Good clinical communication is increasingly recognised as pivotal to the success of medical practice, with much research having shown that the quality of communication greatly influences such factors as patient satisfaction and eventual health outcomes. Yet while communication skills training has already been widely incorporated into the curricula of medical schools around the world, doctors and other healthcare practitioners have mindsets so deeply entrenched in biomedicine that the human dimension continues to be side-lined in healthcare delivery. It is no wonder, then, that clinicians continue to struggle in their medical interactions on an everyday basis, despite the increased focus on patient-centred care globally. By examining clinical communication training with simulated patients (SP) in a young medical school in Singapore, this thesis aims to reflect and reflect upon the current efforts of medical educators endeavouring in the field. Video recordings of SP-based simulation training were collected from the school’s Clinical Communication Practicum for third-year undergraduate medical students. Using the emic, qualitative methodology of Conversation Analysis, these interactions were analysed via detailed inspection of the video data aided by transcriptions made from these recordings according to Jeffersonian conventions. Comprising a total of six simulated scenarios and 18 students, over five hours of footage was transcribed and analysed from a larger corpus of twice the size. Each session encompasses a simulated consultation between a student and an SP, as well as a facilitator-led feedback discussion involving both parties and other students. A scrutiny of the simulated consultations shows that the delivery and explanation of patient diagnoses and/or conditions follow largely similar trajectories. Students begin by first stating their intent, before attempting to establish the SP’s prior knowledge about the diagnosis/condition. Leveraging on this in the actual delivery, they then give an account of its causes and symptoms. Later, in explaining the diagnostic and/or treatment plan, they often make use of strategies such as signposting to construct a methodical framework. Nevertheless, the overall organisation of the consultation ultimately varies according to the scenario in question. Two scenarios that are considerably different from the rest separately required students to dissuade an SP against hospital discharge and persuade a senior colleague to conduct a diagnostic test. Across the board, however, the students’ consultations are characterised by two pervasive features: (1) an orientation towards information sharing over empathic understanding, and (2) an inadequacy in their calibration of language use. The feedback discussion then commences after the simulated consultation is complete. Facilitators guide this second segment using Pendleton’s rules as the adopted framework, which required them to garner feedback from all participants in terms of “what was done well” and “what could be improved”. The analysis shows this structured approach as both a boon and a bane for student learning. While facilitators’ stringent adherence to the rules ensure that students receive feedback from all parties, it subjects the discussion to a rigid configuration that limits input to certain forms which may otherwise turn out more substantial with free debate. On the other hand, when facilitators do not formulate their guiding prompts in a manner that clearly demarcates the two questions, feedback received is either imbalanced or imprecise. Skilful use of the rules in facilitation is therefore needed to ensure that students receive (and themselves produce) rich feedback that enhances their learning. From the various findings, recommendations have been made to improve the teaching and learning of clinical communication in medical education. These target the design of the scenarios, representations made by SPs and students, the role of facilitators, and the use of the data as teaching materials. Nonetheless, caution must be exercised in implementation to ensure that these suggestions do not culminate in yet another prescriptive framework, but instead benefit SP training participants by raising their awareness of different conversational approaches and aiding them in deploying their own strategies of handling clinical interactions. Master of Arts 2019-09-04T01:35:34Z 2019-12-06T16:16:09Z 2019-09-04T01:35:34Z 2019-12-06T16:16:09Z 2019 Thesis Ng, G. T. (2019). Clinical communication training in medical education : a conversation analytic approach. Master's thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/86104 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49850 10.32657/10356/86104 en 238 p. application/pdf