Does mandatory rotation of audit partners improve audit quality?
Opponents of mandatory rotation argue that a change of partner is bad for audit quality, as it results in a loss of client-specific knowledge. On the other hand, proponents argue that a change of partner is beneficial, as it results in a positive peer review effect and a fresh perspective on the aud...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Lennox, Clive S., Wu, Xi, Zhang, Tianyu |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Nanyang Business School |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/87657 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46766 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Does mandatory rotation of audit partners improve audit quality?
by: Singapore Management University
Published: (2018) -
Stock price contagion effects of low-quality audits at the individual audit partner level
by: GUL, Ferdinand A., et al.
Published: (2019) -
Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality?
by: CHEN, Chih-Ying, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Does client acquisition impair the objectivity of engagement partners and engagement quality review partners?
by: Chan, Ian, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Mandatory management disclosure and mandatory independent audit of internal controls : evidence of configural information processing by investors
by: Kelly, Khim, et al.
Published: (2018)