Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea
ASEAN is notable for the ‘long peace’ in the region that has existed since the 1980s. Most analysts have attributed this success to the norms enshrined in the 1976 ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC), and which the members have accepted as an intrinsic part of their intra-ASEAN and internati...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88093 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40149 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-88093 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-880932020-11-01T08:47:16Z Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea JN, Mak S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science ASEAN is notable for the ‘long peace’ in the region that has existed since the 1980s. Most analysts have attributed this success to the norms enshrined in the 1976 ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC), and which the members have accepted as an intrinsic part of their intra-ASEAN and international relations. However, this paper argues that the ‘long peace’ applied only to interactions and developments on land. In contrast, a ‘conflict-threat’ process, including militarization of disputes, has marked ASEAN relations in contested maritime zones, especially in the South China Sea and the Celebes Sea. This is in complete variance with the norms of the ‘ASEAN way, which endorses non-use of threat or force in addressing conflicts. This is because two different realms exist within ASEAN – the terrestrial and the maritime – where different norms apply. This paper argues that a ‘state of nature’ exists in contested maritime zones, with ASEAN members engaged in boundary making. This explains why cooperation at sea has been highly problematic, in contrast to the terrestrial realm where territorial boundaries/sovereignties have been clearly established. Fundamentally, the ‘ASEAN way’ still does not apply to the maritime realm, and cooperation at sea will thus be difficult to achieve. Successful joint development and cooperation in the Gulf of Thailand in fact confirms the argument. 2016-02-25T07:24:57Z 2019-12-06T16:55:50Z 2016-02-25T07:24:57Z 2019-12-06T16:55:50Z 2008 Working Paper JN, M. (2008). Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 156). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88093 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40149 en RSIS Working Papers, 156-08 Nanyang Technological University 36 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science JN, Mak Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea |
description |
ASEAN is notable for the ‘long peace’ in the region that has existed since the 1980s. Most analysts have attributed this success to the norms enshrined in the 1976 ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC), and which the members have accepted as an intrinsic part of their intra-ASEAN and international relations. However, this paper argues that the ‘long peace’ applied only to interactions and developments on land. In contrast, a ‘conflict-threat’ process, including militarization of disputes, has marked ASEAN relations in contested maritime zones, especially in the South China Sea and the Celebes Sea. This is in complete variance with the norms of the ‘ASEAN way, which endorses non-use of threat or force in addressing conflicts. This is because two different realms exist within ASEAN – the terrestrial and the maritime – where different norms apply. This paper argues that a ‘state of nature’ exists in contested maritime zones, with ASEAN members engaged in boundary making. This explains why cooperation at sea has been highly problematic, in contrast to the terrestrial realm where territorial boundaries/sovereignties have been clearly established. Fundamentally, the ‘ASEAN way’ still does not apply to the maritime realm, and cooperation at sea will thus be difficult to achieve. Successful joint development and cooperation in the Gulf of Thailand in fact confirms the argument. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies JN, Mak |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
JN, Mak |
author_sort |
JN, Mak |
title |
Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea |
title_short |
Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea |
title_full |
Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea |
title_fullStr |
Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sovereignty In ASEAN and The Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea |
title_sort |
sovereignty in asean and the problem of maritime cooperation in the south china sea |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88093 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40149 |
_version_ |
1688665530848772096 |