A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing technology has been rapidly developed and increasingly popular nowadays; its applications spread to almost every corner in our lives. However, when printing products with overhangs, support structures are often needed, resulting in extended build time, post-processing and m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stringer, Jonathan, Xu, Xun, Zheng, Pai, Jiang, Jingchao
Other Authors: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88296
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/45764
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-88296
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-882962020-09-24T20:11:17Z A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing Stringer, Jonathan Xu, Xun Zheng, Pai Jiang, Jingchao School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro-AM 2018) Singapore Centre for 3D Printing Additive Manufacturing Support Structure DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Prototyping Additive manufacturing technology has been rapidly developed and increasingly popular nowadays; its applications spread to almost every corner in our lives. However, when printing products with overhangs, support structures are often needed, resulting in extended build time, post-processing and material waste. Numerous papers have been published on reducing support structure consumption, thus minimizing the cost and manufacture time. However, there are still no benchmarking examples and criteria in the literature for support structure comparison, resulting in hard to distinguish which method is better than another, especially in the situation that they use different standards and geometries for their research. In this paper, a specific part is proposed as a standard geometry, all research with regard to support structure can compare the results based on this benchmarking part. Line and concentric support methods from Cura 2.6.2 based on an Original Prusa i3 MK2 printer are tested and demonstrated in this paper by using this benchmarking part. Published version 2018-08-30T07:00:56Z 2019-12-06T17:00:06Z 2018-08-30T07:00:56Z 2019-12-06T17:00:06Z 2018 Conference Paper Jiang, J., Stringer, J., Xu, X., & Zheng, P. (2018). A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro-AM 2018), 196-201. doi:10.25341/D42G6H https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88296 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/45764 10.25341/D42G6H en © 2018 Nanyang Technological University. Published by Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. 6 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Additive Manufacturing
Support Structure
DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Prototyping
spellingShingle Additive Manufacturing
Support Structure
DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Prototyping
Stringer, Jonathan
Xu, Xun
Zheng, Pai
Jiang, Jingchao
A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing
description Additive manufacturing technology has been rapidly developed and increasingly popular nowadays; its applications spread to almost every corner in our lives. However, when printing products with overhangs, support structures are often needed, resulting in extended build time, post-processing and material waste. Numerous papers have been published on reducing support structure consumption, thus minimizing the cost and manufacture time. However, there are still no benchmarking examples and criteria in the literature for support structure comparison, resulting in hard to distinguish which method is better than another, especially in the situation that they use different standards and geometries for their research. In this paper, a specific part is proposed as a standard geometry, all research with regard to support structure can compare the results based on this benchmarking part. Line and concentric support methods from Cura 2.6.2 based on an Original Prusa i3 MK2 printer are tested and demonstrated in this paper by using this benchmarking part.
author2 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
author_facet School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Stringer, Jonathan
Xu, Xun
Zheng, Pai
Jiang, Jingchao
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Stringer, Jonathan
Xu, Xun
Zheng, Pai
Jiang, Jingchao
author_sort Stringer, Jonathan
title A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing
title_short A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing
title_full A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing
title_fullStr A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed A benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing
title_sort benchmarking part for evaluating and comparing support structures of additive manufacturing
publishDate 2018
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88296
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/45764
_version_ 1681056776461484032