Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, is a technology where successive layers of material are deposited one on top of the other to form parts. AM has a high degree of design flexibility and allows the fabrication of highly customized parts in a short amount of time, making it idea...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88722 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/45888 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-88722 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-887222020-09-24T20:12:11Z Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing Moon, Seung Ki Sacco, Enea Chua, Zhong Yang School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro-AM 2018) Singapore Centre for 3D Printing ASTM Additive Manufacturing DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Prototyping Additive Manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, is a technology where successive layers of material are deposited one on top of the other to form parts. AM has a high degree of design flexibility and allows the fabrication of highly customized parts in a short amount of time, making it ideal for industries such as aerospace. The mechanical properties of 3D printed materials, especially those produced via Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM), are dependent on many factors, making standardization difficult. Thus far, only a handful of standards have been created specifically for AM so most of the research still relies on previous standards. These old standards generally assume isotropic materials, which makes the results obtained through their use not entirely accurate since 3D printed materials usually have a high degree of anisotropy. This paper is dedicated to the study of the differences in the elastic moduli measured with two different types of coupons designed using ASTM standard D638. Comparison of the values measured for each type of sample shows that the sample geometry does not make a difference when testing 3D printed materials. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) Published version 2018-09-07T03:15:16Z 2019-12-06T17:09:37Z 2018-09-07T03:15:16Z 2019-12-06T17:09:37Z 2018 Conference Paper Sacco, E., Chua, Z. Y., & Moon, S. K. (2018). Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing (Pro-AM 2018), 577-582. doi:10.25341/D47593 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88722 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/45888 10.25341/D47593 en © 2018 Nanyang Technological University. Published by Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. 6 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
ASTM Additive Manufacturing DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Prototyping |
spellingShingle |
ASTM Additive Manufacturing DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering::Prototyping Moon, Seung Ki Sacco, Enea Chua, Zhong Yang Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing |
description |
Additive Manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, is a technology where successive layers of
material are deposited one on top of the other to form parts. AM has a high degree of design flexibility and allows the fabrication of highly customized parts in a short amount of time, making it ideal for industries such as aerospace. The mechanical properties of 3D printed materials, especially those produced via Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM), are dependent on many factors, making standardization difficult. Thus far, only a handful of standards have been created
specifically for AM so most of the research still relies on previous standards. These old standards generally assume isotropic materials, which makes the results obtained through their use not entirely accurate since 3D printed materials usually have a high degree of anisotropy. This paper is dedicated to the study of the differences in the elastic moduli measured with two different types of coupons designed using ASTM standard D638. Comparison of the values measured
for each type of sample shows that the sample geometry does not make a difference when testing 3D printed materials. |
author2 |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Moon, Seung Ki Sacco, Enea Chua, Zhong Yang |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Moon, Seung Ki Sacco, Enea Chua, Zhong Yang |
author_sort |
Moon, Seung Ki |
title |
Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing |
title_short |
Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing |
title_full |
Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing |
title_sort |
comparison of elastic properties for different sample types fabricated with additive manufacturing |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88722 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/45888 |
_version_ |
1681057466069024768 |