Context-based and explainable decision making with argumentation
Argumentation-based approaches to decision making have gained considerable research interest, due to their ability to select and justify decisions. In order to make better decisions, context is a key piece of information that needs to be considered. However, most existing argumentation-based models...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| 其他作者: | |
| 格式: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| 語言: | English |
| 出版: |
2019
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88889 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49589 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 機構: | Nanyang Technological University |
| 語言: | English |
| 總結: | Argumentation-based approaches to decision making have gained considerable research interest, due to their ability to select and justify decisions. In order to make better decisions, context is a key piece of information that needs to be considered. However, most existing argumentation-based models and frameworks have not modelled or reasoned with context explicitly. In this paper, we present a new argumentation-based approach for making context-based and explainable decisions. We propose a graphical representation for modelling decision problems involving varying contexts, Decision Graphs with Context (DGC), and a reasoning mechanism for making context-based decisions which relies on the Assumption-based Argumentation formalism. Based on these constructs, we introduce two types of explanations, argument explanation and context explanation,
identifying the reasons for the decisions made from an argument-view and a context-view respectively. |
|---|