Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses
This paper investigates the behaviour of load-bearing precast wall system (namely the HC Precast System − HCPS) subject to seismicity in Malaysia. Recent tremors felt across the country heeded the call for the need of seismic design guidelines to be implemented. For this study, the design ground acc...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88906 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46989 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-88906 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-889062020-03-07T11:43:31Z Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses Tiong, Patrick Liq Yee Chiew, Sing Ping Teow, Beng Hur School of Civil and Environmental Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering Precast Wall Low Seismicity This paper investigates the behaviour of load-bearing precast wall system (namely the HC Precast System − HCPS) subject to seismicity in Malaysia. Recent tremors felt across the country heeded the call for the need of seismic design guidelines to be implemented. For this study, the design ground acceleration for Malaysia has not been finalized. Throughout the years, several schools of thought that occurred among different researchers pertaining to the value of design ground acceleration, ranging from 0.05 g to 0.1 g. The implications of the selected values can be great especially in designing new buildings or retrofitting existing ones. Thus, linear analysis using Modal Response Spectrum Analysis (MRSA) and nonlinear pushover analysis of representative HCPS were performed for this study. The finite element (FE) model focused particularly on the nonlinear behaviour of the interface between a precast wall and cast in-situ column. Prior to the modal and pushover analyses, the FE model was validated against quasi-static cyclic test results of identical precast system obtained from literature. Differences between the MRSA and pushover approaches are presented and discussed. Performance levels of the structural system were subjected to three levels of design ground acceleration (0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 g) have been included. Published version 2018-12-17T04:49:38Z 2019-12-06T17:13:29Z 2018-12-17T04:49:38Z 2019-12-06T17:13:29Z 2016 Journal Article Tiong, P. L. Y., Chiew, S. P., & Teow, B. H. (2016). Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses. Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 6, 11-21. doi:10.1016/j.csse.2016.05.001 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88906 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46989 10.1016/j.csse.2016.05.001 en Case Studies in Structural Engineering © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 11 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering Precast Wall Low Seismicity |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering Precast Wall Low Seismicity Tiong, Patrick Liq Yee Chiew, Sing Ping Teow, Beng Hur Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses |
description |
This paper investigates the behaviour of load-bearing precast wall system (namely the HC Precast System − HCPS) subject to seismicity in Malaysia. Recent tremors felt across the country heeded the call for the need of seismic design guidelines to be implemented. For this study, the design ground acceleration for Malaysia has not been finalized. Throughout the years, several schools of thought that occurred among different researchers pertaining to the value of design ground acceleration, ranging from 0.05 g to 0.1 g. The implications of the selected values can be great especially in designing new buildings or retrofitting existing ones. Thus, linear analysis using Modal Response Spectrum Analysis (MRSA) and nonlinear pushover analysis of representative HCPS were performed for this study. The finite element (FE) model focused particularly on the nonlinear behaviour of the interface between a precast wall and cast in-situ column. Prior to the modal and pushover analyses, the FE model was validated against quasi-static cyclic test results of identical precast system obtained from literature. Differences between the MRSA and pushover approaches are presented and discussed. Performance levels of the structural system were subjected to three levels of design ground acceleration (0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 g) have been included. |
author2 |
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Tiong, Patrick Liq Yee Chiew, Sing Ping Teow, Beng Hur |
format |
Article |
author |
Tiong, Patrick Liq Yee Chiew, Sing Ping Teow, Beng Hur |
author_sort |
Tiong, Patrick Liq Yee |
title |
Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses |
title_short |
Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses |
title_full |
Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses |
title_fullStr |
Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses |
title_sort |
case study of load-bearing precast wall system subject to low seismic intensity by linear and nonlinear analyses |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88906 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46989 |
_version_ |
1681049089350828032 |