A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV

This paper conducts a comprehensive study between the single-camera light-field particle image velocimetry (LF-PIV) and the multi-camera tomographic particle image velocimetry (Tomo-PIV). Simulation studies were first performed using synthetic light-field and tomographic particle images, which exten...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shi, Shengxian, Ding, Junfei, Atkinson, Callum, Soria, Julio, New, Tze How
Other Authors: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88951
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48341
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-88951
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-889512023-03-04T17:14:49Z A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV Shi, Shengxian Ding, Junfei Atkinson, Callum Soria, Julio New, Tze How School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering Light-field Camera Light-field Particle Image Velocimetry This paper conducts a comprehensive study between the single-camera light-field particle image velocimetry (LF-PIV) and the multi-camera tomographic particle image velocimetry (Tomo-PIV). Simulation studies were first performed using synthetic light-field and tomographic particle images, which extensively examine the difference between these two techniques by varying key parameters such as pixel to microlens ratio (PMR), light-field camera Tomo-camera pixel ratio (LTPR), particle seeding density and tomographic camera number. Simulation results indicate that the single LF-PIV can achieve accuracy consistent with that of multi-camera Tomo-PIV, but requires the use of overall greater number of pixels. Experimental studies were then conducted by simultaneously measuring low-speed jet flow with single-camera LF-PIV and four-camera Tomo-PIV systems. Experiments confirm that given a sufficiently high pixel resolution, a single-camera LF-PIV system can indeed deliver volumetric velocity field measurements for an equivalent field of view with a spatial resolution commensurate with those of multi-camera Tomo-PIV system, enabling accurate 3D measurements in applications where optical access is limited. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Accepted version 2019-05-23T05:56:15Z 2019-12-06T17:14:27Z 2019-05-23T05:56:15Z 2019-12-06T17:14:27Z 2018 Journal Article Shi, S., Ding, J., Atkinson, C., Soria, J., & New, T. H. (2018). A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV. Experiments in Fluids, 59(3), 46-. doi:10.1007/s00348-018-2500-9 0723-4864 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88951 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48341 10.1007/s00348-018-2500-9 en Experiments in Fluids © 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Experiments in Fluids and is made available with permission of Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. 30 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering
Light-field Camera
Light-field Particle Image Velocimetry
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering
Light-field Camera
Light-field Particle Image Velocimetry
Shi, Shengxian
Ding, Junfei
Atkinson, Callum
Soria, Julio
New, Tze How
A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV
description This paper conducts a comprehensive study between the single-camera light-field particle image velocimetry (LF-PIV) and the multi-camera tomographic particle image velocimetry (Tomo-PIV). Simulation studies were first performed using synthetic light-field and tomographic particle images, which extensively examine the difference between these two techniques by varying key parameters such as pixel to microlens ratio (PMR), light-field camera Tomo-camera pixel ratio (LTPR), particle seeding density and tomographic camera number. Simulation results indicate that the single LF-PIV can achieve accuracy consistent with that of multi-camera Tomo-PIV, but requires the use of overall greater number of pixels. Experimental studies were then conducted by simultaneously measuring low-speed jet flow with single-camera LF-PIV and four-camera Tomo-PIV systems. Experiments confirm that given a sufficiently high pixel resolution, a single-camera LF-PIV system can indeed deliver volumetric velocity field measurements for an equivalent field of view with a spatial resolution commensurate with those of multi-camera Tomo-PIV system, enabling accurate 3D measurements in applications where optical access is limited.
author2 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
author_facet School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Shi, Shengxian
Ding, Junfei
Atkinson, Callum
Soria, Julio
New, Tze How
format Article
author Shi, Shengxian
Ding, Junfei
Atkinson, Callum
Soria, Julio
New, Tze How
author_sort Shi, Shengxian
title A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV
title_short A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV
title_full A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV
title_fullStr A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV
title_full_unstemmed A detailed comparison of single-camera light-field PIV and tomographic PIV
title_sort detailed comparison of single-camera light-field piv and tomographic piv
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88951
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48341
_version_ 1759856201821061120