How long can optimal locally repairable codes be?
A locally repairable code (LRC) with locality r allows for the recovery of any erased codeword symbol using only r other codeword symbols. A Singleton-type bound dictates the best possible trade-off between the dimension and distance of LRCs - an LRC attaining this trade-off is deemed optimal. Such...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89385 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46213 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-89385 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-893852023-02-28T19:36:17Z How long can optimal locally repairable codes be? Guruswami, Venkatesan Xing, Chaoping Yuan, Chen School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences DRNTU::Science::Mathematics Locally Repairable Code Singleton Bound A locally repairable code (LRC) with locality r allows for the recovery of any erased codeword symbol using only r other codeword symbols. A Singleton-type bound dictates the best possible trade-off between the dimension and distance of LRCs - an LRC attaining this trade-off is deemed optimal. Such optimal LRCs have been constructed over alphabets growing linearly in the block length. Unlike the classical Singleton bound, however, it was not known if such a linear growth in the alphabet size is necessary, or for that matter even if the alphabet needs to grow at all with the block length. Indeed, for small code distances 3,4, arbitrarily long optimal LRCs were known over fixed alphabets. Here, we prove that for distances d >=slant 5, the code length n of an optimal LRC over an alphabet of size q must be at most roughly O(d q^3). For the case d=5, our upper bound is O(q^2). We complement these bounds by showing the existence of optimal LRCs of length Omega_{d,r}(q^{1+1/floor[(d-3)/2]}) when d <=slant r+2. Our bounds match when d=5, pinning down n=Theta(q^2) as the asymptotically largest length of an optimal LRC for this case. Published version 2018-10-03T08:07:58Z 2019-12-06T17:24:20Z 2018-10-03T08:07:58Z 2019-12-06T17:24:20Z 2018 Journal Article Guruswami, V., Xing, C., & Yuan, C. (2018). How long can optimal locally repairable codes be?. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, 116, 41-. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2018.41 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89385 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46213 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2018.41 en Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics © 2018 Venkatesan Guruswami, Chaoping Xing, and Chen Yuan; licensed under Creative Commons License CC-BY. 11 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Science::Mathematics Locally Repairable Code Singleton Bound |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Science::Mathematics Locally Repairable Code Singleton Bound Guruswami, Venkatesan Xing, Chaoping Yuan, Chen How long can optimal locally repairable codes be? |
description |
A locally repairable code (LRC) with locality r allows for the recovery of any erased codeword symbol using only r other codeword symbols. A Singleton-type bound dictates the best possible trade-off between the dimension and distance of LRCs - an LRC attaining this trade-off is deemed optimal. Such optimal LRCs have been constructed over alphabets growing linearly in the block length. Unlike the classical Singleton bound, however, it was not known if such a linear growth in the alphabet size is necessary, or for that matter even if the alphabet needs to grow at all with the block length. Indeed, for small code distances 3,4, arbitrarily long optimal LRCs were known over fixed alphabets. Here, we prove that for distances d >=slant 5, the code length n of an optimal LRC over an alphabet of size q must be at most roughly O(d q^3). For the case d=5, our upper bound is O(q^2). We complement these bounds by showing the existence of optimal LRCs of length Omega_{d,r}(q^{1+1/floor[(d-3)/2]}) when d <=slant r+2. Our bounds match when d=5, pinning down n=Theta(q^2) as the asymptotically largest length of an optimal LRC for this case. |
author2 |
School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Guruswami, Venkatesan Xing, Chaoping Yuan, Chen |
format |
Article |
author |
Guruswami, Venkatesan Xing, Chaoping Yuan, Chen |
author_sort |
Guruswami, Venkatesan |
title |
How long can optimal locally repairable codes be? |
title_short |
How long can optimal locally repairable codes be? |
title_full |
How long can optimal locally repairable codes be? |
title_fullStr |
How long can optimal locally repairable codes be? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How long can optimal locally repairable codes be? |
title_sort |
how long can optimal locally repairable codes be? |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89385 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46213 |
_version_ |
1759856078295662592 |