A dilemma for non-analytic naturalism
In recent years, an impressive research program has developed around non‐analytic reductions of the normative. Nevertheless, non‐analytic naturalists face a damning dilemma: either they need to give the same reductive analysis for epistemic and practical reasons, or they can give a different analyse...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Forcehimes, Andrew T. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | School of Humanities |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90162 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48444 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Relationship sensitive consequentialism Is regrettable
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2022) -
Non-negotiable : why moral naturalism cannot do away with categorical reasons
by: Luco, Andrés Carlos
Published: (2021) -
Are there distinctively moral reasons?
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2019) -
An Introduction to Ethics and Ethical Decision-Making
by: CHAN, Gary
Published: (2009) -
Thinking through utilitarianism : a guide to contemporary arguments
by: Forcehimes, Andrew T., et al.
Published: (2022)