Beneficence : does agglomeration matter?

• Main Authors: Forcehimes, Andrew T., Semrau, Luke
• Other Authors: School of Humanities
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2019
• Subjects: DRNTU::Humanities::Philosophy; Benevolence in Applied Ethics; Effective Altruism
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90184; http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48440
• Institution: Nanyang Technological University

When it comes to the duty of beneficence, a formidable class of moderate positions holds that morally significant considerations emerge when one's actions are seen as part of a larger series. Agglomeration, according to these moderates, limits the demands of beneficence, thereby avoiding the extremely demanding view forcefully defended by Peter Singer. This idea has much appeal. What morality can demand of people is, it seems, appropriately modulated by how much they have already done or will do. Here we examine a number of recent proposals that appeal to agglomeration. None of them, we argue, succeeds.