Criterial problems in creative cognition research

• Main Author: Chen, Melvin
• Other Authors: School of Humanities
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2019
• Subjects: Conceptual Pluralism; DRNTU::Humanities::Philosophy; Bundles-of-criteria Theory Of Meaning
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90278; http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48494
• Institution: Nanyang Technological University

In creative cognition research, the Romantic view about creative cognition is traditionally rejected in favor of the modern view. The modern view about creative cognition maintains that creativity is neither mysterious nor unintelligible and that it is indeed susceptible to analysis. The paradigmatic objects of analysis in creative cognition research have been creative output and the creative process. The degree of creativity of an output is assessed in accordance with certain criterial definitions. The degree of creativity of a cognitive process is assessed in accordance with certain models of creative cognition, psychometric test measures, and neuroimaging studies that are grounded in certain criteria for assessment. The reliance on criterial definitions and criteria for assessment in analyzing either the creative output or the creative process suggests that creative cognition researchers remain under the sway of the classical, bundles-of-criteria theory of meaning. In this paper, I will critically evaluate the criterial problems that confront both criterial definitions and criteria for assessment before proposing an alternative theory of meaning.