ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity
Various proposals for an “ASEAN Community” (e.g. Bali Concord II) have committed ASEAN to establish a more institutionalised organisation with the capacity to guide substantive “political and security cooperation”. Such an outcome would evidence well-developed levels of trust, interest harmoni...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90559 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6527 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-90559 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-905592020-11-01T08:40:15Z ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity Christopher Roberts S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences Various proposals for an “ASEAN Community” (e.g. Bali Concord II) have committed ASEAN to establish a more institutionalised organisation with the capacity to guide substantive “political and security cooperation”. Such an outcome would evidence well-developed levels of trust, interest harmonisation and foreign policy coordination. This paper analyses how state weakness and divergent political values represent the biggest challenge to these outcomes. While state weakness detracts from regional security and cohesion (e.g. Myanmar), divergent political values lead to divisions over the manner and extent to which the ASEAN members can and will cooperate in relation to both domestic and regional issues. State weakness also generates internal security dilemmas that detract from regionalists enterprises (e.g. post-Suharto Indonesia). Nonetheless, economic cooperation has been relatively more feasible for all the ASEAN members as it has the potential to enhance domestic stability and (for the less democratic members) it can also provide added regime security through “performance legitimacy”. Finally, the capacity gaps and divergence of political values currently extant in the region mean that ASEAN will remain a mutual sovereignty-reinforcing (intergovernmental) model of regional organisation for the foreseeable future. While ASEAN may achieve incremental progress towards the realisation of its regionalist goals, policy makers should plan for a multi-decade approach rather than the current goal of achieving an “ASEAN Community”— particularly the “Security Community” and “Socio-Cultural Community” pillars—by 2015. 2011-01-11T03:00:44Z 2019-12-06T17:49:51Z 2011-01-11T03:00:44Z 2019-12-06T17:49:51Z 2010 2010 Working Paper Christopher Roberts. (2010). ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 217). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90559 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6527 en RSIS Working Paper ; 217/10 40 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Social sciences |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Social sciences Christopher Roberts ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity |
description |
Various proposals for an “ASEAN Community” (e.g. Bali Concord II) have committed ASEAN to establish a more institutionalised organisation with the capacity
to guide substantive “political and security cooperation”. Such an outcome would
evidence well-developed levels of trust, interest harmonisation and foreign policy
coordination. This paper analyses how state weakness and divergent political values represent the biggest challenge to these outcomes. While state weakness detracts from regional security and cohesion (e.g. Myanmar), divergent political values lead to
divisions over the manner and extent to which the ASEAN members can and will
cooperate in relation to both domestic and regional issues. State weakness also
generates internal security dilemmas that detract from regionalists enterprises (e.g.
post-Suharto Indonesia). Nonetheless, economic cooperation has been relatively more
feasible for all the ASEAN members as it has the potential to enhance domestic
stability and (for the less democratic members) it can also provide added regime security through “performance legitimacy”. Finally, the capacity gaps and divergence of political values currently extant in the region mean that ASEAN will remain a mutual sovereignty-reinforcing (intergovernmental) model of regional organisation for the foreseeable future. While ASEAN may achieve incremental progress towards
the realisation of its regionalist goals, policy makers should plan for a multi-decade
approach rather than the current goal of achieving an “ASEAN Community”—
particularly the “Security Community” and “Socio-Cultural Community” pillars—by 2015. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Christopher Roberts |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Christopher Roberts |
author_sort |
Christopher Roberts |
title |
ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity |
title_short |
ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity |
title_full |
ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity |
title_fullStr |
ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity |
title_full_unstemmed |
ASEAN institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity |
title_sort |
asean institutionalisation : the function of political values and state capacity |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90559 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6527 |
_version_ |
1686109406981259264 |