Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict
The first ever Indonesian court ruling of convicts as terrorists and the branding of the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) organisation as a "terrorist" one is examined in great detail in this paper. Beginning with the historical development of other counter-terror trials that took place in the Archi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90738 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6104 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-90738 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-907382020-11-01T08:42:39Z Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail Arianti, V. Yang, Jennifer Hui S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology::Terrorism The first ever Indonesian court ruling of convicts as terrorists and the branding of the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) organisation as a "terrorist" one is examined in great detail in this paper. Beginning with the historical development of other counter-terror trials that took place in the Archipelago, it attempts to compare the cases of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih to their precedents and highlights some of its downplayed, but astonishing significances. It also takes a look at the reasons behind the reluctance of the government in banning the JI and suggests possible implications resulting from the verdict. 2009-09-22T01:43:48Z 2019-12-06T17:53:04Z 2009-09-22T01:43:48Z 2019-12-06T17:53:04Z 2009 2009 Working Paper Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail., Arianti, V., & Yang, J. H. (2009). Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 176). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90738 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6104 en RSIS Working Papers ; 176/09 41 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology::Terrorism |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology::Terrorism Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail Arianti, V. Yang, Jennifer Hui Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict |
description |
The first ever Indonesian court ruling of convicts as terrorists and the branding of the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) organisation as a "terrorist" one is examined in great detail in this paper. Beginning with the historical development of other counter-terror trials that took place in the Archipelago, it attempts to compare the cases of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih to their precedents and highlights some of its downplayed, but astonishing significances. It also takes a look at the reasons behind the reluctance of the government in banning the JI and suggests possible implications resulting from the verdict. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail Arianti, V. Yang, Jennifer Hui |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail Arianti, V. Yang, Jennifer Hui |
author_sort |
Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail |
title |
Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict |
title_short |
Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict |
title_full |
Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict |
title_fullStr |
Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict |
title_full_unstemmed |
Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict |
title_sort |
significance of abu dujana and zarkasih's verdict |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90738 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6104 |
_version_ |
1688665264541925376 |