Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects

We provide insights on how market size uncertainty affects the optimal quality (quantity) provision in distribution channels when consumers are heterogeneous in their willingness to pay for product quality. In this context, we denote the difference between the manufacturer’s optimal quality (quantit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu, Yan, Shi, Hongyan, Petruzzi, Nicholas C.
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90788
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48506
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-90788
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-907882023-05-19T06:44:42Z Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects Liu, Yan Shi, Hongyan Petruzzi, Nicholas C. Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Marketing OR In Marketing Market Uncertainty We provide insights on how market size uncertainty affects the optimal quality (quantity) provision in distribution channels when consumers are heterogeneous in their willingness to pay for product quality. In this context, we denote the difference between the manufacturer’s optimal quality (quantity) provision for a centralized channel and its optimal analog for a decentralized channel as the quality (quantity) differential. We find that market size uncertainty creates or increases the quantity differential, but it does not affect the differential’s polarity. In contrast, market size uncertainty decreases the quality differential and it does so to the extent that, depending on the level of consumer heterogeneity, it reverses the differential’s polarity. Moreover, we find that the higher the inherent uncertainty level, the more pronounced are the effects. We likewise find that the effects of market size uncertainty are amplified if the notion of consumer heterogeneity is replaced with retail-level competition. Accepted version 2019-05-31T03:31:50Z 2019-12-06T17:54:03Z 2019-05-31T03:31:50Z 2019-12-06T17:54:03Z 2018 Journal Article Liu, Y., Shi, H., & Petruzzi, N. C. (2018). Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution: Market size uncertainty effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 265(3), 1144-1158. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.030 0377-2217 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90788 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48506 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.030 en European Journal of Operational Research © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This paper was published in European Journal of Operational Research and is made available with permission of Elsevier B.V. 33 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business::Marketing
OR In Marketing
Market Uncertainty
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::Marketing
OR In Marketing
Market Uncertainty
Liu, Yan
Shi, Hongyan
Petruzzi, Nicholas C.
Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects
description We provide insights on how market size uncertainty affects the optimal quality (quantity) provision in distribution channels when consumers are heterogeneous in their willingness to pay for product quality. In this context, we denote the difference between the manufacturer’s optimal quality (quantity) provision for a centralized channel and its optimal analog for a decentralized channel as the quality (quantity) differential. We find that market size uncertainty creates or increases the quantity differential, but it does not affect the differential’s polarity. In contrast, market size uncertainty decreases the quality differential and it does so to the extent that, depending on the level of consumer heterogeneity, it reverses the differential’s polarity. Moreover, we find that the higher the inherent uncertainty level, the more pronounced are the effects. We likewise find that the effects of market size uncertainty are amplified if the notion of consumer heterogeneity is replaced with retail-level competition.
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Liu, Yan
Shi, Hongyan
Petruzzi, Nicholas C.
format Article
author Liu, Yan
Shi, Hongyan
Petruzzi, Nicholas C.
author_sort Liu, Yan
title Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects
title_short Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects
title_full Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects
title_fullStr Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects
title_full_unstemmed Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects
title_sort optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90788
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48506
_version_ 1770566836327284736