Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects
We provide insights on how market size uncertainty affects the optimal quality (quantity) provision in distribution channels when consumers are heterogeneous in their willingness to pay for product quality. In this context, we denote the difference between the manufacturer’s optimal quality (quantit...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90788 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48506 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-90788 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-907882023-05-19T06:44:42Z Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects Liu, Yan Shi, Hongyan Petruzzi, Nicholas C. Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Marketing OR In Marketing Market Uncertainty We provide insights on how market size uncertainty affects the optimal quality (quantity) provision in distribution channels when consumers are heterogeneous in their willingness to pay for product quality. In this context, we denote the difference between the manufacturer’s optimal quality (quantity) provision for a centralized channel and its optimal analog for a decentralized channel as the quality (quantity) differential. We find that market size uncertainty creates or increases the quantity differential, but it does not affect the differential’s polarity. In contrast, market size uncertainty decreases the quality differential and it does so to the extent that, depending on the level of consumer heterogeneity, it reverses the differential’s polarity. Moreover, we find that the higher the inherent uncertainty level, the more pronounced are the effects. We likewise find that the effects of market size uncertainty are amplified if the notion of consumer heterogeneity is replaced with retail-level competition. Accepted version 2019-05-31T03:31:50Z 2019-12-06T17:54:03Z 2019-05-31T03:31:50Z 2019-12-06T17:54:03Z 2018 Journal Article Liu, Y., Shi, H., & Petruzzi, N. C. (2018). Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution: Market size uncertainty effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 265(3), 1144-1158. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.030 0377-2217 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90788 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48506 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.030 en European Journal of Operational Research © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This paper was published in European Journal of Operational Research and is made available with permission of Elsevier B.V. 33 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Business::Marketing OR In Marketing Market Uncertainty |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Business::Marketing OR In Marketing Market Uncertainty Liu, Yan Shi, Hongyan Petruzzi, Nicholas C. Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects |
description |
We provide insights on how market size uncertainty affects the optimal quality (quantity) provision in distribution channels when consumers are heterogeneous in their willingness to pay for product quality. In this context, we denote the difference between the manufacturer’s optimal quality (quantity) provision for a centralized channel and its optimal analog for a decentralized channel as the quality (quantity) differential. We find that market size uncertainty creates or increases the quantity differential, but it does not affect the differential’s polarity. In contrast, market size uncertainty decreases the quality differential and it does so to the extent that, depending on the level of consumer heterogeneity, it reverses the differential’s polarity. Moreover, we find that the higher the inherent uncertainty level, the more pronounced are the effects. We likewise find that the effects of market size uncertainty are amplified if the notion of consumer heterogeneity is replaced with retail-level competition. |
author2 |
Nanyang Business School |
author_facet |
Nanyang Business School Liu, Yan Shi, Hongyan Petruzzi, Nicholas C. |
format |
Article |
author |
Liu, Yan Shi, Hongyan Petruzzi, Nicholas C. |
author_sort |
Liu, Yan |
title |
Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects |
title_short |
Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects |
title_full |
Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects |
title_fullStr |
Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects |
title_sort |
optimal quality and quantity provisions for centralized vs. decentralized distribution : market size uncertainty effects |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90788 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48506 |
_version_ |
1770566836327284736 |