Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control

In many practical problems, the primary controlled variable is not available for feedback and is needed to be controlled indirectly using secondary measurements. We derive bounds on the H-2 H-inf optimal achievable performance for systems under indirect control, which have all scalar signals. These...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kariwala, Vinay, Skogestad, Sigurd
Other Authors: School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91098
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/5986
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-91098
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-910982023-12-29T06:44:10Z Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control Kariwala, Vinay Skogestad, Sigurd School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (44th : 2005 : Seville, Spain) DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation::Control engineering In many practical problems, the primary controlled variable is not available for feedback and is needed to be controlled indirectly using secondary measurements. We derive bounds on the H-2 H-inf optimal achievable performance for systems under indirect control, which have all scalar signals. These bounds are useful for gaining insights into the factors posing limitations on the achievable performance. As compared to direct control, the unstable poles can severely limit the control quality for indirect control. The limiting effect of the unstable poles can be reduced using an additional feedforward controller, when the disturbance is measurable. Published version 2009-08-03T00:59:38Z 2019-12-06T17:59:41Z 2009-08-03T00:59:38Z 2019-12-06T17:59:41Z 2005 2005 Conference Paper Kariwala, V., & Skogestad, S. (2005). Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control. Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005, (pp. 3620-3625). https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91098 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/5986 en 6 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering
DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation::Control engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Chemical engineering
DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation::Control engineering
Kariwala, Vinay
Skogestad, Sigurd
Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control
description In many practical problems, the primary controlled variable is not available for feedback and is needed to be controlled indirectly using secondary measurements. We derive bounds on the H-2 H-inf optimal achievable performance for systems under indirect control, which have all scalar signals. These bounds are useful for gaining insights into the factors posing limitations on the achievable performance. As compared to direct control, the unstable poles can severely limit the control quality for indirect control. The limiting effect of the unstable poles can be reduced using an additional feedforward controller, when the disturbance is measurable.
author2 School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
author_facet School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
Kariwala, Vinay
Skogestad, Sigurd
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Kariwala, Vinay
Skogestad, Sigurd
author_sort Kariwala, Vinay
title Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control
title_short Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control
title_full Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control
title_fullStr Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control
title_full_unstemmed Limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control
title_sort limits of disturbance rejection using indirect control
publishDate 2009
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91098
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/5986
_version_ 1787136701969203200