The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review
The Department of Defence’s long-awaited Quadrennial Defence Review offers little new when it comes to discussing the future direction of the US military. More notably, it hardly mentions the “transformation” of the US military, or the likely future challenges of a Chi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Commentary |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91193 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6568 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
| Language: | English |
| id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-91193 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-911932020-11-01T07:39:39Z The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review Bitzinger, Richard A. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences::Military and naval science::Strategy The Department of Defence’s long-awaited Quadrennial Defence Review offers little new when it comes to discussing the future direction of the US military. More notably, it hardly mentions the “transformation” of the US military, or the likely future challenges of a Chinese “peer competitor”. 2011-01-13T08:40:50Z 2019-12-06T18:01:20Z 2011-01-13T08:40:50Z 2019-12-06T18:01:20Z 2010 2010 Commentary Richard A. Bitzinger. (2010). The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 018). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91193 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6568 en RSIS Commentaries ; 018/10 3 p. application/pdf |
| institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
| building |
NTU Library |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Singapore Singapore |
| content_provider |
NTU Library |
| collection |
DR-NTU |
| language |
English |
| topic |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Military and naval science::Strategy |
| spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Social sciences::Military and naval science::Strategy Bitzinger, Richard A. The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review |
| description |
The Department of Defence’s long-awaited Quadrennial Defence Review offers little new when it comes to discussing the future direction of the US military. More notably, it hardly mentions the
“transformation” of the US military, or the likely future challenges of a Chinese “peer competitor”. |
| author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
| author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Bitzinger, Richard A. |
| format |
Commentary |
| author |
Bitzinger, Richard A. |
| author_sort |
Bitzinger, Richard A. |
| title |
The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review |
| title_short |
The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review |
| title_full |
The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review |
| title_fullStr |
The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The dog that didn’t bark? The 2010 Quadrennial Defence Review |
| title_sort |
dog that didn’t bark? the 2010 quadrennial defence review |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91193 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6568 |
| _version_ |
1683494251795578880 |