ICC's verdict on Darfur : whose responsibility?
The International Criminal Court's unprecedented ruling to arrest the Sudanese president for crimes against humanity is a step further in advancing the doctrine of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). However, in the global arena of competing state interests, the step forward is beset by a num...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Commentary |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91995 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6090 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | The International Criminal Court's unprecedented ruling to arrest the Sudanese president for crimes against humanity is a step further in advancing the doctrine of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). However, in the global arena of competing state interests, the step forward is beset by a number of obstacles. Nonetheless, the implications on Asia are significant. |
---|