Limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in Singapore

This article explores the interactions and tensions arising from a vibrant Canto-pop industry exported from Hong Kong to an interventionist nation-state of Singapore bent on discouraging the use of dialects by its ethnic Chinese population. Aside from highlighting the roles of technological and comm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liew, Kai Khiun
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/92192
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6805
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-92192
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-921922020-03-07T12:15:51Z Limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in Singapore Liew, Kai Khiun Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information DRNTU::Humanities::Language::Chinese This article explores the interactions and tensions arising from a vibrant Canto-pop industry exported from Hong Kong to an interventionist nation-state of Singapore bent on discouraging the use of dialects by its ethnic Chinese population. Aside from highlighting the roles of technological and commercial factors behind the regional music networks, it seeks further to position this contemporary relationship within the larger historical and cultural context. The cultural politics involved here is not just an isolated phenomenon between two different cities. More importantly, the language policies of the Singapore government represent a haunting replication of the perennial attempts by central authorities in China to impose a more standardised linguistic and cultural identity on its dialect speaking peripheries. This identity is based on not just the court language of Mandarin, but notions of ‘Chineseness’. This article goes on to question the extent to which Canto-pop could help foster a more hybridised identity transcending both the current dictates of the modern Singaporean state and the imagined cultural boundaries of a more historically entrenched Sino-centric realm. Published version 2011-06-01T04:39:19Z 2019-12-06T18:18:58Z 2011-06-01T04:39:19Z 2019-12-06T18:18:58Z 2003 2003 Journal Article Liew, K. K. (2003). Limited Pidgin-Type Patois? Policy, Language, Technology, Identity and the Experience of Canto-Pop in Singapore. Popular Music, 22(2), 217-233. 0261-1430 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/92192 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6805 10.1017/S0261143003003131 155431 Popular music © 2004 Institution of Engineering and Technology. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by IEE Proceedings Circuits Devices and Systems, Institution of Engineering and Technology.  It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document.  The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-cds:20040226. 17 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
topic DRNTU::Humanities::Language::Chinese
spellingShingle DRNTU::Humanities::Language::Chinese
Liew, Kai Khiun
Limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in Singapore
description This article explores the interactions and tensions arising from a vibrant Canto-pop industry exported from Hong Kong to an interventionist nation-state of Singapore bent on discouraging the use of dialects by its ethnic Chinese population. Aside from highlighting the roles of technological and commercial factors behind the regional music networks, it seeks further to position this contemporary relationship within the larger historical and cultural context. The cultural politics involved here is not just an isolated phenomenon between two different cities. More importantly, the language policies of the Singapore government represent a haunting replication of the perennial attempts by central authorities in China to impose a more standardised linguistic and cultural identity on its dialect speaking peripheries. This identity is based on not just the court language of Mandarin, but notions of ‘Chineseness’. This article goes on to question the extent to which Canto-pop could help foster a more hybridised identity transcending both the current dictates of the modern Singaporean state and the imagined cultural boundaries of a more historically entrenched Sino-centric realm.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Liew, Kai Khiun
format Article
author Liew, Kai Khiun
author_sort Liew, Kai Khiun
title Limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in Singapore
title_short Limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in Singapore
title_full Limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in Singapore
title_fullStr Limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in Singapore
title_sort limited pidgin-type patois? policy, language, technology, identity and the experience of canto-pop in singapore
publishDate 2011
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/92192
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6805
_version_ 1681036100711219200