Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology
This study examines the impact of photographic–textual and risk–benefit frames on the level of visual attention, risk perception, and public support for nuclear energy and nanotechnology in Singapore. Using a 2 (photographic–textual vs. textual-only frames) × 2 (risk vs. benefit frames) × 2 (nuclear...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/97961 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48536 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-97961 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-979612024-03-07T00:12:45Z Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology Lee, Edmund Wei Jian Ho, Shirley S. Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Photographic Framing Visual Framing DRNTU::Visual arts and music::Photography This study examines the impact of photographic–textual and risk–benefit frames on the level of visual attention, risk perception, and public support for nuclear energy and nanotechnology in Singapore. Using a 2 (photographic–textual vs. textual-only frames) × 2 (risk vs. benefit frames) × 2 (nuclear energy vs. nanotechnology) between-subject design with eye-tracking data, the results showed that photographic–textual frames elicited more attention and did have partial amplification effect. However, this was observable only in the context of nuclear energy, where public support was lowest when participants were exposed to risk frames accompanied by photographs. Implications for theory and practice were discussed. Accepted version 2019-06-04T07:08:48Z 2019-12-06T19:48:50Z 2019-06-04T07:08:48Z 2019-12-06T19:48:50Z 2018 Journal Article Lee, E. W. J., & Ho, S. S. (2018). Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(4), 948-970. doi:10.1177/1077699017741090 1077-6990 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/97961 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48536 10.1177/1077699017741090 en Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly © 2017 Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly and is made available with permission of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. 35 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Photographic Framing Visual Framing DRNTU::Visual arts and music::Photography |
spellingShingle |
Photographic Framing Visual Framing DRNTU::Visual arts and music::Photography Lee, Edmund Wei Jian Ho, Shirley S. Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology |
description |
This study examines the impact of photographic–textual and risk–benefit frames on the level of visual attention, risk perception, and public support for nuclear energy and nanotechnology in Singapore. Using a 2 (photographic–textual vs. textual-only frames) × 2 (risk vs. benefit frames) × 2 (nuclear energy vs. nanotechnology) between-subject design with eye-tracking data, the results showed that photographic–textual frames elicited more attention and did have partial amplification effect. However, this was observable only in the context of nuclear energy, where public support was lowest when participants were exposed to risk frames accompanied by photographs. Implications for theory and practice were discussed. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Lee, Edmund Wei Jian Ho, Shirley S. |
format |
Article |
author |
Lee, Edmund Wei Jian Ho, Shirley S. |
author_sort |
Lee, Edmund Wei Jian |
title |
Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology |
title_short |
Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology |
title_full |
Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology |
title_fullStr |
Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are photographs worth more than a thousand words? Examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology |
title_sort |
are photographs worth more than a thousand words? examining the effects of photographic–textual and textual-only frames on public attitude toward nuclear energy and nanotechnology |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/97961 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48536 |
_version_ |
1794549323327864832 |