Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process

To support multicast applications while improving wavelength capacity utilization in wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks, dynamic multicast traffic grooming problem has been extensively studied in recent years, and various algorithms using either lightpath or light-tree schemes have been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu, Xiaojun, Xiao, Gaoxi, Cheng, Tee Hiang
Other Authors: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98042
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12189
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-98042
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-980422020-03-07T13:24:48Z Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process Yu, Xiaojun Xiao, Gaoxi Cheng, Tee Hiang School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Photonics Global Conference (2012 : Singapore) DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering To support multicast applications while improving wavelength capacity utilization in wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks, dynamic multicast traffic grooming problem has been extensively studied in recent years, and various algorithms using either lightpath or light-tree schemes have been proposed. To the best of our knowledge, however, no systematic comparison has ever been made between the blocking performances of these two different types of schemes. In this paper, we firstly present a brief survey of the various existing algorithms for dynamic multicast traffic grooming, followed by a short discussion on the pros and cons of lightpath and lightp-tree schemes respectively. By conducting extensive numerical simulations, we carefully compare the blocking performances of these two types of schemes. Our study results show that, in most cases, the lightpath-based methods outperform the light-tree based ones, typically with only a slightly higher consumption of O/E/O resources. We provide an explanation to such interesting observations. Effects of the ratio of multicast traffic to overall network traffic and the average number of destinations of each multicast request are also studied. 2013-07-25T04:01:47Z 2019-12-06T19:49:57Z 2013-07-25T04:01:47Z 2019-12-06T19:49:57Z 2012 2012 Conference Paper Yu, X., Xiao, G., & Cheng, T.-H. (2012). Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process . 2012 Photonics Global Conference (PGC). https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98042 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12189 10.1109/PGC.2012.6458069 en © 2012 IEEE.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering
Yu, Xiaojun
Xiao, Gaoxi
Cheng, Tee Hiang
Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process
description To support multicast applications while improving wavelength capacity utilization in wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks, dynamic multicast traffic grooming problem has been extensively studied in recent years, and various algorithms using either lightpath or light-tree schemes have been proposed. To the best of our knowledge, however, no systematic comparison has ever been made between the blocking performances of these two different types of schemes. In this paper, we firstly present a brief survey of the various existing algorithms for dynamic multicast traffic grooming, followed by a short discussion on the pros and cons of lightpath and lightp-tree schemes respectively. By conducting extensive numerical simulations, we carefully compare the blocking performances of these two types of schemes. Our study results show that, in most cases, the lightpath-based methods outperform the light-tree based ones, typically with only a slightly higher consumption of O/E/O resources. We provide an explanation to such interesting observations. Effects of the ratio of multicast traffic to overall network traffic and the average number of destinations of each multicast request are also studied.
author2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
author_facet School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Yu, Xiaojun
Xiao, Gaoxi
Cheng, Tee Hiang
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Yu, Xiaojun
Xiao, Gaoxi
Cheng, Tee Hiang
author_sort Yu, Xiaojun
title Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process
title_short Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process
title_full Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process
title_fullStr Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process
title_sort performance comparisons between lightpath and light-tree schemes in dynamic multicast traffic grooming process
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98042
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12189
_version_ 1681047807444647936