An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants

Most Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies did not quantify the aquatic eco-toxic potential (aquatic ETP) of the brine disposal mainly due to the limitation of current life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approaches. The purpose of this study is to develop an improved approach for assessing the aquatic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhou, Jin, Chang, Victor Wei-Chung, Fane, Anthony Gordon
Other Authors: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98169
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17603
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-98169
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-981692020-03-07T11:43:45Z An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants Zhou, Jin Chang, Victor Wei-Chung Fane, Anthony Gordon School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Singapore Membrane Technology Centre Most Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies did not quantify the aquatic eco-toxic potential (aquatic ETP) of the brine disposal mainly due to the limitation of current life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approaches. The purpose of this study is to develop an improved approach for assessing the aquatic ETP of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants. The proposed approach, named group-by-group approach, calculates the average aquatic ETP as the sum of the impacts generated by acknowledged groups of influential chemicals. This approach firstly identifies the influential chemicals. According to the chemical property and the impact pathway to the aquatic ecosystem, the important chemicals are then categorized into groups under three categories. Depending on the characteristics of the defined groups, different strategies are applied to determine the impact of each group. The group-by-group approach takes the merits of two most commonly-used approaches, chemical specific approach and whole effluent approach. The results from the case study indicated that this approach reduces the reliance on the comprehensive chemical composition analysis and temporal ecotoxicology test of the complex desalination brine. It also provides a more comprehensive coverage, not only considering the impact of organic chemicals and metals, but also including the contribution of inorganic chemicals. 2013-11-12T05:47:07Z 2019-12-06T19:51:43Z 2013-11-12T05:47:07Z 2019-12-06T19:51:43Z 2012 2012 Journal Article Zhou, J., Chang, V. W.-C., & Fane, A. G. (2013). An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants. Desalination, 308,233-241. 0011-9164 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98169 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17603 10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.039 en Desalination
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
description Most Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies did not quantify the aquatic eco-toxic potential (aquatic ETP) of the brine disposal mainly due to the limitation of current life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approaches. The purpose of this study is to develop an improved approach for assessing the aquatic ETP of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants. The proposed approach, named group-by-group approach, calculates the average aquatic ETP as the sum of the impacts generated by acknowledged groups of influential chemicals. This approach firstly identifies the influential chemicals. According to the chemical property and the impact pathway to the aquatic ecosystem, the important chemicals are then categorized into groups under three categories. Depending on the characteristics of the defined groups, different strategies are applied to determine the impact of each group. The group-by-group approach takes the merits of two most commonly-used approaches, chemical specific approach and whole effluent approach. The results from the case study indicated that this approach reduces the reliance on the comprehensive chemical composition analysis and temporal ecotoxicology test of the complex desalination brine. It also provides a more comprehensive coverage, not only considering the impact of organic chemicals and metals, but also including the contribution of inorganic chemicals.
author2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
author_facet School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Zhou, Jin
Chang, Victor Wei-Chung
Fane, Anthony Gordon
format Article
author Zhou, Jin
Chang, Victor Wei-Chung
Fane, Anthony Gordon
spellingShingle Zhou, Jin
Chang, Victor Wei-Chung
Fane, Anthony Gordon
An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants
author_sort Zhou, Jin
title An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants
title_short An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants
title_full An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants
title_fullStr An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants
title_full_unstemmed An improved life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants
title_sort improved life cycle impact assessment (lcia) approach for assessing aquatic eco-toxic impact of brine disposal from seawater desalination plants
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98169
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17603
_version_ 1681046557325000704