Extracting proofs from tabled proof search

We consider the problem of model checking specifications involving co-inductive definitions such as are available for bisimulation. A proof search approach to model checking with such specifications often involves state exploration. We consider four different tabling strategies that can minimize su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miller, Dale., Tiu, Alwen.
Other Authors: School of Computer Engineering
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98261
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/18356
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-98261
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-982612020-05-28T07:17:41Z Extracting proofs from tabled proof search Miller, Dale. Tiu, Alwen. School of Computer Engineering International Conference of Certified Programs and Proofs (3rd : 2013 : Melbourne, Australia) DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering We consider the problem of model checking specifications involving co-inductive definitions such as are available for bisimulation. A proof search approach to model checking with such specifications often involves state exploration. We consider four different tabling strategies that can minimize such exploration significantly. In general, tabling involves storing previously proved subgoals and reusing (instead of reproving) them in proof search. In the case of co-inductive proof search, tables allow a limited form of loop checking, which is often necessary for, say, checking bisimulation of non-terminating processes. We enhance the notion of tabled proof search by allowing a limited deduction from tabled entries when performing table lookup. The main problem with this enhanced tabling method is that it is generally unsound when co-inductive definitions are involved and when tabled entries contain unproved entries. We design a proof system with tables and show that by managing tabled entries carefully, one would still be able to obtain a sound proof system. That is, we show how one can extract a post-fixed point from a tabled proof for a co-inductive goal. We then apply this idea to the technique of bisimulation ``up-to'' commonly used in process algebra. 2013-12-23T03:37:39Z 2019-12-06T19:52:54Z 2013-12-23T03:37:39Z 2019-12-06T19:52:54Z 2013 2013 Conference Paper Miller, D., & Tiu, A. (2013). Extracting Proofs from Tabled Proof Search. Third International Conference, CPP 2013, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 8307, pp.194-210. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98261 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/18356 10.1007/978-3-319-03545-1_13 en © 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering
Miller, Dale.
Tiu, Alwen.
Extracting proofs from tabled proof search
description We consider the problem of model checking specifications involving co-inductive definitions such as are available for bisimulation. A proof search approach to model checking with such specifications often involves state exploration. We consider four different tabling strategies that can minimize such exploration significantly. In general, tabling involves storing previously proved subgoals and reusing (instead of reproving) them in proof search. In the case of co-inductive proof search, tables allow a limited form of loop checking, which is often necessary for, say, checking bisimulation of non-terminating processes. We enhance the notion of tabled proof search by allowing a limited deduction from tabled entries when performing table lookup. The main problem with this enhanced tabling method is that it is generally unsound when co-inductive definitions are involved and when tabled entries contain unproved entries. We design a proof system with tables and show that by managing tabled entries carefully, one would still be able to obtain a sound proof system. That is, we show how one can extract a post-fixed point from a tabled proof for a co-inductive goal. We then apply this idea to the technique of bisimulation ``up-to'' commonly used in process algebra.
author2 School of Computer Engineering
author_facet School of Computer Engineering
Miller, Dale.
Tiu, Alwen.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Miller, Dale.
Tiu, Alwen.
author_sort Miller, Dale.
title Extracting proofs from tabled proof search
title_short Extracting proofs from tabled proof search
title_full Extracting proofs from tabled proof search
title_fullStr Extracting proofs from tabled proof search
title_full_unstemmed Extracting proofs from tabled proof search
title_sort extracting proofs from tabled proof search
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98261
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/18356
_version_ 1681056939178459136