Comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections

A comparative study on the influence of different manufacturing process on physical, chemical and mechanical properties of cold-formed, hot-formed and cold-formed with subsequent heat treatment steel square structural hollowsections manufactured to Grade S355J2H of BSEN10219 and BSEN10210was carried...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao, M. S., Chiew, Sing Ping
Other Authors: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98784
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/13422
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-98784
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-987842020-03-07T11:43:28Z Comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections Zhao, M. S. Chiew, Sing Ping School of Civil and Environmental Engineering International Symposium on Tubular Structures (14th : 2012 : London, UK) A comparative study on the influence of different manufacturing process on physical, chemical and mechanical properties of cold-formed, hot-formed and cold-formed with subsequent heat treatment steel square structural hollowsections manufactured to Grade S355J2H of BSEN10219 and BSEN10210was carried out. Physical propertieswere checked against the corresponding production standards. Chemical composition test using optical emission spectrometerwas employed to analyze their differences in chemical contents,while tensile test, sectioning test and hole-drilling test were carried out to analyze the difference in mechanical properties such as yield stress, tensile stress, ductility, impact toughness and locked-in residual stress. The study concluded that mechanical properties are greatly affected by their manufacturing process, and hot-finished sections are not the same as hot-formed sections although they shared the same production standard. 2013-09-09T07:58:00Z 2019-12-06T19:59:37Z 2013-09-09T07:58:00Z 2019-12-06T19:59:37Z 2012 2012 Conference Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98784 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/13422 10.1201/b13139-110 en © 2012 Taylor & Francis Group, London
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
description A comparative study on the influence of different manufacturing process on physical, chemical and mechanical properties of cold-formed, hot-formed and cold-formed with subsequent heat treatment steel square structural hollowsections manufactured to Grade S355J2H of BSEN10219 and BSEN10210was carried out. Physical propertieswere checked against the corresponding production standards. Chemical composition test using optical emission spectrometerwas employed to analyze their differences in chemical contents,while tensile test, sectioning test and hole-drilling test were carried out to analyze the difference in mechanical properties such as yield stress, tensile stress, ductility, impact toughness and locked-in residual stress. The study concluded that mechanical properties are greatly affected by their manufacturing process, and hot-finished sections are not the same as hot-formed sections although they shared the same production standard.
author2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
author_facet School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Zhao, M. S.
Chiew, Sing Ping
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Zhao, M. S.
Chiew, Sing Ping
spellingShingle Zhao, M. S.
Chiew, Sing Ping
Comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections
author_sort Zhao, M. S.
title Comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections
title_short Comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections
title_full Comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections
title_fullStr Comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections
title_sort comparative study on cold-formed, hot-formed and hot-finished structural hollow sections
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/98784
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/13422
_version_ 1681044828721250304