Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries?

In recent years, emotional intelligence and emotional intelligence measures have been used in a plethora of countries and cultures. This is also the case for the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), highlighting the importance of examining whether the WLEIS is invariant across regions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Libbrecht, Nele, Beuckelaer, Alain De, Lievens, Filip, Rockstuhl, Thomas
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99049
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12546
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-99049
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-990492023-05-19T06:44:40Z Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries? Libbrecht, Nele Beuckelaer, Alain De Lievens, Filip Rockstuhl, Thomas Nanyang Business School In recent years, emotional intelligence and emotional intelligence measures have been used in a plethora of countries and cultures. This is also the case for the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), highlighting the importance of examining whether the WLEIS is invariant across regions other than the Far Eastern region (China) where it was originally developed. This study investigated the measurement invariance (MI) of the WLEIS scores across two countries, namely Singapore (N= 505) and Belgium (N= 339). Apart from items measuring the factor “use of emotion”, the measurement structure underlying the WLEIS ratings was generally invariant across both countries as there was no departure from MI in terms of factor form and factor loadings. The scalar invariance model (imposing an identical threshold structure) was partially supported. Factor intercorrelations (not involving the factor “use of emotion”) were also identical across countries. These results show promise for the invariance of the WLEIS scores across different countries, yet warn of the non-invariance of the dimension “use of emotion”. Reducing the motivation-oriented nature of these items is in order to come to an exact model fit in cross-cultural comparisons. 2013-07-31T03:08:59Z 2019-12-06T20:02:40Z 2013-07-31T03:08:59Z 2019-12-06T20:02:40Z 2012 2012 Journal Article Libbrecht, N., Beuckelaer, A. D., Lievens, F.,& Rockstuhl, T. (2012). Measurement Invariance of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale Scores: Does the Measurement Structure Hold across Far Eastern and European Countries?. Applied Psychology. 0269-994X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99049 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12546 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00513.x en Applied psychology
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
description In recent years, emotional intelligence and emotional intelligence measures have been used in a plethora of countries and cultures. This is also the case for the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS), highlighting the importance of examining whether the WLEIS is invariant across regions other than the Far Eastern region (China) where it was originally developed. This study investigated the measurement invariance (MI) of the WLEIS scores across two countries, namely Singapore (N= 505) and Belgium (N= 339). Apart from items measuring the factor “use of emotion”, the measurement structure underlying the WLEIS ratings was generally invariant across both countries as there was no departure from MI in terms of factor form and factor loadings. The scalar invariance model (imposing an identical threshold structure) was partially supported. Factor intercorrelations (not involving the factor “use of emotion”) were also identical across countries. These results show promise for the invariance of the WLEIS scores across different countries, yet warn of the non-invariance of the dimension “use of emotion”. Reducing the motivation-oriented nature of these items is in order to come to an exact model fit in cross-cultural comparisons.
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Libbrecht, Nele
Beuckelaer, Alain De
Lievens, Filip
Rockstuhl, Thomas
format Article
author Libbrecht, Nele
Beuckelaer, Alain De
Lievens, Filip
Rockstuhl, Thomas
spellingShingle Libbrecht, Nele
Beuckelaer, Alain De
Lievens, Filip
Rockstuhl, Thomas
Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries?
author_sort Libbrecht, Nele
title Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries?
title_short Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries?
title_full Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries?
title_fullStr Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries?
title_full_unstemmed Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries?
title_sort measurement invariance of the wong and law emotional intelligence scale scores : does the measurement structure hold across far eastern and european countries?
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99049
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12546
_version_ 1770564519400046592