A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method

This paper uses a hybrid method to reconstruct 3D polyhedral objects from 2D line drawings by combining two known methods, the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method, and presents comprehensive test results comparing the three methods. The cubic corner method is deterministic and v...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Lee, Yong Tsui, Fang, Fen
其他作者: School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: 2013
主題:
在線閱讀:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99050
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12753
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Nanyang Technological University
語言: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-99050
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-990502020-03-07T13:22:18Z A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method Lee, Yong Tsui Fang, Fen School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering This paper uses a hybrid method to reconstruct 3D polyhedral objects from 2D line drawings by combining two known methods, the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method, and presents comprehensive test results comparing the three methods. The cubic corner method is deterministic and very efficient. It recovers accurate 3D objects from accurate drawings but for inaccurate drawings, the quality of its results varies with the accuracy of the input. In general, the optimisation-based method produces approximate 3D objects that conform to human perception of the drawings. But it is computationally demanding, and can sometimes converge to incorrect results, partly due to poor initial values for the optimisation. The hybrid method starts with the cubic corner method, and uses its output as the initial guess for the optimisation process, which then produces a better quality 3D object than either method on its own. Tests are conducted for each method using drawings of varying degrees of accuracy. The results of the cubic corner method and the hybrid method are consistent, with accurate inputs producing good results and inaccurate input producing poor results. The results of the optimisation-based method are inconsistent. The hybrid method produces the best results in general, but it is less efficient than the cubic corner method and more efficient than the optimisation-based method. 2013-08-01T03:49:18Z 2019-12-06T20:02:41Z 2013-08-01T03:49:18Z 2019-12-06T20:02:41Z 2012 2012 Journal Article Lee, Y. T.,& Fang, F. (2012). A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method. Computer-Aided Design, 44(11), 1090-1102. 0010-4485 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99050 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12753 10.1016/j.cad.2012.06.001 en Computer-aided design
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineering
Lee, Yong Tsui
Fang, Fen
A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method
description This paper uses a hybrid method to reconstruct 3D polyhedral objects from 2D line drawings by combining two known methods, the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method, and presents comprehensive test results comparing the three methods. The cubic corner method is deterministic and very efficient. It recovers accurate 3D objects from accurate drawings but for inaccurate drawings, the quality of its results varies with the accuracy of the input. In general, the optimisation-based method produces approximate 3D objects that conform to human perception of the drawings. But it is computationally demanding, and can sometimes converge to incorrect results, partly due to poor initial values for the optimisation. The hybrid method starts with the cubic corner method, and uses its output as the initial guess for the optimisation process, which then produces a better quality 3D object than either method on its own. Tests are conducted for each method using drawings of varying degrees of accuracy. The results of the cubic corner method and the hybrid method are consistent, with accurate inputs producing good results and inaccurate input producing poor results. The results of the optimisation-based method are inconsistent. The hybrid method produces the best results in general, but it is less efficient than the cubic corner method and more efficient than the optimisation-based method.
author2 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
author_facet School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Lee, Yong Tsui
Fang, Fen
format Article
author Lee, Yong Tsui
Fang, Fen
author_sort Lee, Yong Tsui
title A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method
title_short A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method
title_full A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method
title_fullStr A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method
title_full_unstemmed A new hybrid method for 3D object recovery from 2D drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method
title_sort new hybrid method for 3d object recovery from 2d drawings and its validation against the cubic corner method and the optimisation-based method
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99050
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/12753
_version_ 1681049670170705920