Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud
There are competing arguments and mixed prior evidence on whether firms that are aggressive in their financial reporting exhibit more or less tax aggressiveness. Our research contributes to resolving this issue by examining the association between aggressive tax reporting and the incidence of allege...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99735 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17723 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-99735 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-997352023-05-19T06:44:41Z Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud Lennox, Clive S. Lisowsky, Petro Pittman, Jeffrey Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Accounting There are competing arguments and mixed prior evidence on whether firms that are aggressive in their financial reporting exhibit more or less tax aggressiveness. Our research contributes to resolving this issue by examining the association between aggressive tax reporting and the incidence of alleged accounting fraud. Relying on several proxies for tax aggressiveness to triangulate our evidence, we generally find that tax aggressive U.S. public firms are less likely to commit accounting fraud. However, we caution that our results are sensitive to how tax aggressiveness is measured. More specifically, four (two) of the five (three) proxies for firms’ effective tax rates (book-tax differences) load positively (negatively) during the 1981–2001 period, implying that fraud firms are less tax aggressiveness. Our inferences persist when we isolate the 1995–2001 period in which accounting impropriety steeply rose and corporate tax compliance steeply fell. Moreover, we continue to find that tax aggressive firms are less apt to fraudulently manipulate their financial statements when we apply factor analysis to identify tax avoidance with a common factor extracted from the underlying proxies and match on propensity scores to ensure that the fraud and nonfraud samples have very similar nontax characteristics. 2013-11-15T07:22:48Z 2019-12-06T20:10:51Z 2013-11-15T07:22:48Z 2019-12-06T20:10:51Z 2013 2013 Journal Article Lennox, C. S., Lisowsky, P., & Pittman, J. (2013). Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud. Journal of accounting research, 51(4), 739-778. 0021-8456 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99735 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17723 10.1111/joar.12002 en Journal of accounting research |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Business::Accounting |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Business::Accounting Lennox, Clive S. Lisowsky, Petro Pittman, Jeffrey Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud |
description |
There are competing arguments and mixed prior evidence on whether firms that are aggressive in their financial reporting exhibit more or less tax aggressiveness. Our research contributes to resolving this issue by examining the association between aggressive tax reporting and the incidence of alleged accounting fraud. Relying on several proxies for tax aggressiveness to triangulate our evidence, we generally find that tax aggressive U.S. public firms are less likely to commit accounting fraud. However, we caution that our results are sensitive to how tax aggressiveness is measured. More specifically, four (two) of the five (three) proxies for firms’ effective tax rates (book-tax differences) load positively (negatively) during the 1981–2001 period, implying that fraud firms are less tax aggressiveness. Our inferences persist when we isolate the 1995–2001 period in which accounting impropriety steeply rose and corporate tax compliance steeply fell. Moreover, we continue to find that tax aggressive firms are less apt to fraudulently manipulate their financial statements when we apply factor analysis to identify tax avoidance with a common factor extracted from the underlying proxies and match on propensity scores to ensure that the fraud and nonfraud samples have very similar nontax characteristics. |
author2 |
Nanyang Business School |
author_facet |
Nanyang Business School Lennox, Clive S. Lisowsky, Petro Pittman, Jeffrey |
format |
Article |
author |
Lennox, Clive S. Lisowsky, Petro Pittman, Jeffrey |
author_sort |
Lennox, Clive S. |
title |
Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud |
title_short |
Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud |
title_full |
Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud |
title_fullStr |
Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud |
title_sort |
tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/99735 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17723 |
_version_ |
1770564991180603392 |