Optimal antiplatelet treatment for percutaneous coronary intervention: Clopidogrel vs. ticlopidine
International Journal of Cardiology
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Almsherqi, Z.A., Deng, Y., McLachlan, C.S., Mossop, P. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | PHYSIOLOGY |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/24965 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | National University of Singapore |
Similar Items
-
Optimal antiplatelet treatment for percutaneous coronary intervention: Clopidogrel vs. ticlopidine
by: Almsherqi, Z.A., et al.
Published: (2016) -
Non-bleeding side effects of clopidogrel: Have large multi-center clinical trials underestimated their incidence?
by: Almsherqi, Z.A., et al.
Published: (2011) -
Non-bleeding side effects of clopidogrel: Have large multi-center clinical trials underestimated their incidence?
by: Almsherqi, Z.A., et al.
Published: (2016) -
Switching from Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel in Asian Patients with ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction – A Time Dependent Analysis Study
by: Koh L, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Angiographic and platelet reactivity outcomes with prasugrel 60 mg pretreatment and clopidogrel 600 mg pretreatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention
by: Li, Y., et al.
Published: (2014)